|
Accomplishments
of the
National Science and Technology Council
(NSTC)
1996
Prepared by the NSTC Executive Secretariat
WHITE HOUSE
Dear Colleague:
The Clinton Administration considers science and technology one of the most
vital investments for America's future. Our Nation relies on Federal
investments in science and technology to contribute to: the growth of our
economy; the health of our citizens; the sustainability of our environment and
natural resources; the United States', leadership in critical world markets;
the education of our children; the ensuring of our national security; and the
addressing of global problems through cooperation with other countries.
When President Clinton delivered his State of the Union Address in February
1997, he reaffirmed the Administration's strong commitment to using science
and technology to prepare our country for the future--To prepare America for
the 21st century we must harness the powerful forces of science and technology
to benefit all Americans...we've only begun to spread the benefits of a
technology revolution that should become the modern birthright of every
citizen. Over the past three years, the NSTC has served a vital role in
identifying and prioritizing how Federal investments in science and technology
can be wisely applied toward addressing our Nation's critical needs, in the
context of balancing the budget.
I am pleased to present to you 1996 Accomplishments of The National Science
and
Technology Council (NSTC). Over the course of 1996, the NSTC made
considerable
progress in helping Federal research and development organizations move from
an
autonomous, fiscally expansive environment to a collaborative fiscally
constrained one. Working through the NSTC represents a paradigm, and as such,
will become even more compelling as the players are more comfortable with
change, as innovators recognize the untapped opportunities, and the Federal
research and development enterprise is guided toward a unified set of goals.
Sincerely,
John H. Gibbons
Assistant to the President for
Science and Technology
About the National Science and Technology Council
President Clinton established the National Science and
Technology Council (NSTC) by Executive Order on November 23,
1993. This cabinet-level council is the principle means for
the President to coordinate science, space and technology
policies across the Federal Government. NSTC acts as a
"virtual" agency for science and technology (S&T) to coordinate
the diverse parts of the Federal research and development (R&D)
enterprise. The NSTC is chaired by the President. Membership
consists of the Vice President, Assistant to the President for
Science and Technology, Cabinet Secretaries and Agency Heads
with significant S&T responsibilities, and other White House
officials.
An important objective of the NSTC is the establishment of
clear national goals for Federal S&T investments in areas
ranging from information technologies and health research, to
improving transportation systems and strengthening fundamental
research. The Council prepares R&D strategies that are
coordinated across Federal agencies to form an investment
package that is aimed at accomplishing multiple national goals.
To obtain additional information regarding the NSTC,
contact the NSTC Executive Secretariat at 202-456-6100.
About the Office of Science and Technology Policy
The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) was
established by the National Science and Technology Policy,
Organization and Priorities Act of 1976. OSTP's
responsibilities include advising the President in policy
formulation and budget development on all questions in which
S&T are important elements; articulating the President's S&T
policies and programs, and fostering strong partnerships among
Federal, State and local governments, and the scientific
communities in industry and academe.
This report was prepared by the Executive Secretariat for
the National Science
and Technology Council (NSTC), Angela Phillips Diaz, NSTC
Executive Secretary,
Andrea I. Razzaghi, NSTC Policy Analyst.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary
R&D Budget Guidance
1996 Accomplishments of the National Science and Technology
Council in R&D Goal Areas
I. Maintaining World Leadership in Science, Mathematics, and
Engineering
II. Promoting Long-Term Economic Growth
III. Sustaining a Healthy, Educated Citizenry
IV. Improving Environmental Quality
V. Harnessing Information Technology
VI. Enhancing National Security and Global
Stability
Appendix A - Accomplishments of the President's
Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) in 1996
Appendix B - List of Presidential Directives
Appendix C - Reports Issued by the National
Science and Technology Council
Abstract
The Clinton Administration considers science and technology (S&T)
one of the best investments the U.S. Government can make in America's
future. Investments in S&T contribute to: a growing economy with
more high-skill, high-wage jobs for American workers; a healthier
population; a cleaner environment where energy efficiency, information
technology, and advanced technology increase profits and reduce
pollution; a stronger, more competitive private sector able to
maintain U.S. leadership in critical world markets; an educational
system where every student is challenged; and an inspired scientific
and technological research community focused on ensuring our national
security, on improving the quality of life for ourselves and our
children, and on successfully meeting global problems through
cooperation with other countries. The most important measure of
success will be the U. S. Government's ability to make a difference in
the lives of the American people, to harness S&T to improve the
quality of life and the economic strength of our Nation.
The Clinton Administration is changing the nature of Federal S&T
policy and policymaking. The President established the NSTC in 1993
to coordinate the diverse parts of the Federal research and
development (R&D) enterprise and to foster synergy among the varied
talents of the Federal S&T workforce. In November 1996, the NSTC
completed its third year of operation and moved from the
identification of strategic goals, as defined in the 1995 NSTC
committees' strategic plans, to implementation of specific initiatives
that redirect the Federal Government's investments in S&T toward
fundamental national goals, while streamlining Government and saving
taxpayers' dollars.
A critical function of the NSTC is the identification and
issuance of R&D priorities and goals to serve as guidance for all
Federal agencies to use in their budget development. In 1996, the
NSTC committees contributed to the development of the FY 1998 R&D
budget guidelines for Federal S&T agencies.
A list of initiatives was developed for the NSTC to undertake
during 1996 and other issues were addressed in response to rising
needs. The issues addressed by the NSTC during 1996 are grouped
according to six overarching Presidential themes, though many fall
under more than one category. The six themes are:
I. Maintaining World Leadership in Science, Mathematics, and
Engineering
II. Promoting Long-Term Economic Growth
III. Sustaining a Healthy, Educated Citizenry
IV. Improving Environmental Quality
V. Harnessing Information Technology
VI. Enhancing National Security and Global Stability
During 1996, each of the nine NSTC committees--fundamental
science; health, safety, and food; environment and natural resources;
computing, information, and communications; national security;
technological innovation; transportation; education and training; and
international science, engineering, and technology--achieved
significant accomplishments in addressing specific issues within each
of the six R&D goal areas.
I. Maintaining World Leadership in Science, Mathematics, and
Engineering. The NSTC made several significant accomplishments toward
this goal, including addressing the challenge of how to assess
fundamental science by offering basic assessment principles and
providing information about performance measures. The NSTC also
assessed how well agencies had responded to the Presidential Decision
Directive (PDD NSTC-5), Guidelines for Federal Laboratory Reform,
revealing that progress had been made, but more effort was required to
be fully responsive to the PDD. To address bioethical issues arising
from research on human biology, the President appointed 18 non-
government experts to serve on the National Bioethics Advisory
Commission (NBAC) under the auspices of the NSTC. The NBAC charter
was signed by the Assistant to the President for Science and
Technology in June 1996 and NBAC met for the first time in October
1996. Another important accomplishment during 1996 was the NSTC
review of the United States Antarctic Program, which concluded that
the science performed under that program was of high quality and high
interest and should be maintained within funding constraints.
Finally, in response to communications to the President emphasizing
that the Nation's university research system was going through a
period of stress, the President directed that a review be conducted,
Presidential Review Directive (PRD NSTC-4), to evaluate the need to
revisit Federal policies concerning the capacity of U.S. universities
to meet the Nation's research and educational requirements of the next
century.
II. Promoting Long-Term Economic Growth. The NSTC continued to
foster collaborations between industry, academia, and Federal, State
and local governments. The Partnership for a New Generation of
Vehicles (PNGV) and the National Electronics Manufacturing Initiative
(NEMI) are examples of how an impetus from the Federal Government can
strengthen U.S. industry. Each of the Big Three U.S. automakers--
Ford, Chrysler and General Motors--produced a PNGV concept vehicle
demonstrating different "Supercar" possibilities. NEMI successfully
transitioned into a completely industry-funded, industry-led
incorporation. In the area of construction and building, progress was
made toward streamlining and coordinating regulatory permitting of
construction projects, as well as meeting the National Construction
Goals and the Department of Housing and Urban Developments' National
Home Ownership Strategy. To enhance the technology partnerships
between the Federal and State governments, the United States
Innovation Partnership (USIP) was established. To address civil,
military, scientific, and commercial interests, new Presidential
Directives were issued for National Space Policy and the Global
Positioning System. Additional areas of progress in 1996 that address
this goal include biomass energy, aeronautics and aviation R&D, and
human factors in transportation systems.
III. Sustaining a Healthy, Educated Citizenry. The NSTC established
and presented awards through two new programs that will contribute
significantly toward this goal: 1) Presidential Awards for Excellence
in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring; and 2)
Presidential Early Career Awards for Scientists and Engineers
(PECASE). The NSTC also developed a policy statement on the Nation's
health, safety, and food. With increased attention focused on
children's issues Nation-wide, the NSTC sponsored A National Research
Initiative for Children for the 21st Century to examine the research
agenda on the biological, cognitive, and social development of
America's children and adolescents. In addition, the NSTC played a
vital role in supporting the President's Education Technology
Initiative, launched in February 1996, through active participation
in activities such as NetDays, Tech Corps, and America's Technology
Literacy Challenge.
IV. Improving Environmental Quality. The NSTC fostered the
development of partnerships between the Federal Government and non-
Federal researchers working toward improving environmental quality by
making information available to the public on: 1) Federal
environmental testing and demonstration sites; and 2) Federally-funded
environment and natural resources R&D. The NSTC made progress toward
the goal of integrating the many national environmental monitoring
systems through a series of workshops, with experts from Federal,
State and local governments, academia, non-governmental organizations,
and industry, aimed at building the broadest possible foundation for
integrating this complex, uncoordinated system. The health and safety
issues related to natural disasters, oxygenated fuels and endocrine
disrupting chemicals were also addressed through NSTC efforts.
V. Harnessing Information Technology. The NSTC sponsored a number
of activities during 1996 related to High Performance Computing and
Communications (HPCC) including the PetaSoft Systems Software Summer
Study, workshops on software for high performance computing systems
and PetaFlops architecture, and an exhibit at the Supercomputing '96
Conference. The NSTC was also active in supporting the
Administration's initiatives on the global and national information
infrastructures by coordinating Federal R&D efforts in
telecommunications and information technologies.
VI. Enhancing National Security and Global Stability. Two threats
with international dimensions, emerging infectious diseases and
natural disasters, were addressed by the NSTC. In response to an NSTC
study, Vice President Gore announced PDD NSTC-7, directing the Federal
Government to strengthen the U.S. ability to respond to the growing
threat of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. To address
the international dimensions of natural disasters, the NSTC formed a
working group to consider ways in which U.S. engagement
internationally in the S&T of natural disaster reduction could be more
fully exploited to reduce the costs to life and property from natural
hazards. The NSTC also coordinated U.S. positions for Ministerial
meetings on S&T with key nations and regions. Additionally, the NSTC
prepared several classified reports to allow the Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP) to effectively assess and articulate how the
total Federal program on nonproliferation (such as plutonium
disposition) and arms control meets the President's goals in this
area.
President Clinton established the President's Committee of
Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) at the same time that he
established the NSTC to advise the President on matters involving S&T,
and to assist the NSTC in securing private sector involvement in its
activities. The PCAST, which consists of distinguished individuals
from industry, education and research institutions, and other non-
governmental organizations, serves as the highest level private sector
advisory group for the President and the NSTC. The direct link to the
activities of the NSTC reflects the Administration's intention to
incorporate advice from the private sector in developing the S&T
budgets and policies of this Administration and to secure private
sector advice on the implementation and evaluation of budgets and
policies. Appendix A describes accomplishments of the PCAST for 1996.
R&D BUDGET GUIDANCE
At the beginning of his Administration, President Clinton made a
commitment to the American people to integrate Federal agency R&D
budgets to ensure that the Nation's S&T investments served broad
national goals, as well as agency missions. This Administration
recognizes the contributions that R&D can make to the vitality of this
country as we move to the 21st century. R&D guidance--in the form of
broad policy principles and goals--was issued, for the third
consecutive year, to guide individual agencies in preparing their FY
1998 budgets. This R&D guidance, built on the previous year's
deliberations, was developed by the NSTC committees, each of which
sought input from a wide spectrum of stakeholders. Providing this
guidance to the R&D agencies reinforced the significant paradigm shift
in the way the Federal R&D enterprise is addressed, both from a budget
and a policy standpoint.
In the interest of maintaining excellence, while minimizing
Federal costs and maximizing effectiveness, the FY 1998 R&D policy
principles directed the agencies to:
- emphasize peer review and select programs through a merit based
competitive process;
- jointly fund research and education programs through industry,
university, or State partnerships;
- support multiple goals that provide promise of a high social rate
of return, such as improving the environment and helping American
businesses compete internationally; ensuring national security while
contributing to a strong technical base in civilian businesses; or
coupling research, education, and training to strengthen the technical
literacy of our diverse workforce; and
- establish and use metrics to measure progress and performance
realistically.
I. Maintaining World Leadership in Science,
Mathematics, and Engineering
Scientific discoveries inspire and enrich us, teaching us about
the mysteries of life and the nature of the world. The Federal
Government has an essential mission in ensuring U.S. leadership across
the frontiers of scientific knowledge, as clearly articulated in the
Clinton/Gore policy statement Science in the National Interest1. This
science base forms the foundation for all practical technical
advances. Public investment in fundamental research--both in the
domestic sphere and increasingly in international collaborations--
generates returns from both the direct contributions to knowledge and
the education of future scientists and engineers. Scientific inquiry
is embedded throughout the complex and interactive web of discovery
and practical invention. Advances in scientific understanding form
the basis of new technological achievements; advances in technologies,
in turn, enable and stimulate the search for fundamental knowledge.
The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) and the
National Performance Review (NPR) call for improved accountability,
productivity, and effectiveness of Federal programs through strategic
planning, goal setting, and performance assessment. Assessing
fundamental science presents a challenge that requires the capture of
quantitative, qualitative, and institutional dimensions.
Accomplishments. Building on previous activities conducted in 1995, the NSTC
Committee on Fundamental Science released Assessing Fundamental
Science2. This report distills public and private experience to date
with the assessment of fundamental science, offers basic assessment
principles, and provides information about performance measures.
Assessing Fundamental Science provides Federal agencies and
departments with a consistent set of general principles and high-level
goals for the assessment process in fundamental science.
The Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of Energy (DOE)
and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
laboratory systems account for at least one-fifth of the entire
Federal investment in R&D--approximately $15 billion of an approximate
$70 billion total. In 1995, the NSTC reviewed these laboratory
systems to evaluate their effectiveness in responding to
national S&T needs, and to identify ways the laboratories could
contribute their best with maximum efficiency. This review resulted
in the September 1995 Presidential Decision Directive
(PDD NSTC-5)3, directing the agencies to better focus laboratory
missions, reduce excessive agency oversight, and streamline agency and
laboratory administrative processes. Additional emphasis on balancing
the Federal budget by the year 2002 has placed even greater pressure
on national laboratories to streamline and focus their missions.
Accomplishments. During the summer 1996, OSTP assessed each agency's response to
the PDD. The review confirmed that the agencies are making progress
in meeting the PDD goals, however, much still needs to be done to be
fully responsive. Opportunities exist to advance the goals of the PDD
through simplified directives and better use of Federal personnel
rules and other regulations.
On October 3, 1995, President Clinton signed Executive Order
12975, establishing the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC).
The Commission came about as the result of a proposal developed by
OSTP in consultation with members of the NSTC and interested members
of Congress, to create a standing body of experts to consider
bioethical issues arising from research on human biology and behavior,
including clinical research, and the applications of such research.
Accomplishments. The NBAC charter was signed by the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology on July 28, 1996. The key points of the
charter are:
- The immediate charge to NBAC is to consider issues in the
protection of the rights and welfare of human research subjects and
management and use of genetic information.
- The general charge to NBAC is to consider current and prospective
issues pertinent to the conduct of research on human biology and
behavior and to identify broad, overarching principles to govern the
ethical conduct of such research. NBAC will have the authority to
establish its own priorities and agenda, in accordance with four
criteria described in the charter and subject to NSTC approval.
- NBAC will be composed of experts in the fields of philosophy and
theology, social and behavioral science, law, medicine and biological
research, in addition to representatives of the general public. Its
members will be appointed by the President.
The President appointed 18 members to NBAC, which is chaired by
Dr. Harold Shapiro, president of Princeton University. The inaugural
meeting was held on October 4, 1996.
The U.S. has important foreign policy, national security,
scientific and environmental interests in Antarctica. A strong year-
round presence in Antarctica, in the form of cutting-edge scientific
research supported by infrastructure at three research stations, is
the principal means of realizing these interests. In late 1995,
Congress requested that the NSTC examine the U.S. Antarctic Program
and its policy foundations4. This examination would entail review of
geopolitical factors, the science program, and the program costs and
management. Policy recommendations would be developed with respect to
the scale and scope of the U.S. presence and with respect to the
research infrastructure at the South Pole.
Accomplishments. Under the auspices of the NSTC Committee on Fundamental Science,
a working group with representatives from all Federal agencies with
Antarctic interests, prepared a report on the United States Antarctic
Program5. The report reviewed the National Science Foundation's
management of U.S. Antarctic operations as well as the program's
scientific research and its infrastructure needs. NSTC found the
science to be of high quality and high interest and recommended that
the National Science Foundation form an external, blue-ribbon panel to
suggest how to maintain the science within funding constraints. The
report has been very well received by Congress and the scientific
community. The blue-ribbon panel has been assembled, is chaired by
Norman Augustine (Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Lockheed-Martin
Corporation), and studies detailed questions about U.S. Antarctic
operations, including the major task of rebuilding the South Pole
Station. The Panel should complete their analysis by March 1997.
During 1996, the President received several communications from
national, political, corporate, and educational leaders emphasizing
that the Nation's universities are going through a period of stress.
These stresses could have an impact on the ability of the Nation's
universities to play their traditional role as partners with the
Federal Government in the conduct of R&D and the preparation of future
generations of scientists and engineers. A letter from the
President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) on
the subject recommended a government-wide policy and administrative
review of the U.S. university research system. To sustain the U.S.
national level of innovation for the long term, it is appropriate to
examine the data on what stresses these universities may be faced with
and whether the Federal Government might be contributing to them.
Accomplishments. The President directed that a review, Presidential Review
Directive (PRD NSTC-4), be conducted by a multiagency task force under the auspices of NSTC, to revisit Federal policies concerning the capacity of universities to meet the Nation's research and educational requirements in the next
century. The review will: 1) examine data to determine what might be
the major stresses in the areas of research, education, and
administrative regulations; and 2) determine what the Federal
Government's role should be in addressing any issues raised by the
examination.
Technical progress is the single most important factor in
generating sustained economic growth, estimated to account for as much
as half of the Nation's long-term growth over the past 50 years.
Technology underpins our fastest growing industries and high-wage
jobs, provides the tools needed to compete in every business today,
and drives growth in every major industrialized nation. For more than
200 years, the Federal Government has played a vital role in
establishing scientific and technological infrastructure that has
contributed substantially to U.S. economic growth and the competitive
success of U.S. industry. As outlined in Technology in the National
Interest6, the rich portfolio of policies and programs being carried
out by departments and agencies across the Federal Government ensure
that technology remains the Nation's engine of economic growth,
creating high-wage jobs in the U.S. and improving the standard of
living and quality of life for the American people.
The Federal Government and the U.S. automobile industry have
joined in a historic partnership to establish global technical
leadership in the development and production of commercially-viable
vehicle technology that, over the long term, can preserve personal
mobility while further reducing the impact of cars and light trucks on
the environment and reducing dependence on imported petroleum. This
unprecedented alliance was established on September 29, 1993, and
included Federal agencies, national laboratories, universities,
suppliers and the United States Council of Automobile Research
(USCAR)--a conglomerate of the Big Three U.S. automakers (Ford, Chrysler,
and General Motors). The partnership includes research on: 1)
manufacturing productivity improvement; 2) near-term improvement in
fuel efficiency and emission reduction; and 3) development of a
production prototype by the year 2010 that can achieve three times the
fuel efficiency of today's vehicles with comparable cost and
performance. The research plan is annually peer-reviewed by the
National Research Council (NRC).
Accomplishments. In 1996, each USCAR company produced a PNGV concept vehicle that
demonstrated different "Supercar" possibilities. At the 1996 Detroit
Auto Show, both Ford and Chrysler released their PNGV experimental
concept cars--Ford's Synergy 2010 and Chrysler's Intrepid ESX. In
December 1996, General Motors introduced the industry's first electric
car (EV1) which incorporates various PNGV technologies.
As detailed in the PNGV Technical Accomplishments Report7, both public and private sector participants in PNGV made significant
progress in 1996 in the areas of fuel cell system development,
advanced battery chemistries and other energy storage devices, and new
manufacturing processes. The NRC conducted their second peer review
of the PNGV program and reported their assessment in March 1996,
reaffirming the merits of the program.
Construction is one of the largest industries in the U.S. and a
critical asset for enhancing the Nation's international
competitiveness. The U.S. Government and Industry Cooperative Program
was established under the auspices of the NSTC's Committee on
Technological Innovation (formerly known as the Committee on Civilian
Industrial Technology) to develop and deliver to practice high
performance construction materials and systems, advanced information
systems addressing industry needs, automation for construction
processes and constructed facilities, knowledge needed for
productivity and safety, and measures of effectiveness for
construction technology. This initiative responds to a high level of
industry interest, and combines Government and industry goals.
Accomplishments. Building on the work of Construction and Building: Federal
Research and Development in Support of the U.S. Construction Industry8, and the 1994 National Construction Goals workshop, the NSTC
Construction and Building Subcommittee held a workshop in April 1996
to define potential collaborations between industry, academia, and
Federal, State, and local governments.
In September 1996, with the NSTC working group on State-Federal
Technology Partnerships, the Subcommittee on Construction and Building
initiated a project to be performed by the National Council of States
Building Codes and Standards (NCSBCS) to streamline and coordinate the
regulatory permitting of construction projects by developing model
regulations and standards. Permitting involves compliance with land
use, zoning, environmental, and health and safety regulations of
local, State, and Federal agencies. These model regulations and
procedures will be developed in consultation with industry and State
and local governments, then, once finalized, recommended for use by
agencies at the local, State and Federal levels.
In December 1996, the NSTC Subcommittee on Construction and
Building, the Departments of Housing and Urban Development (HUD),
Commerce, Energy and Defense, and the National Association of
Homebuilders collaborated to develop a research agenda and
implementation plan for the residential sector of the industry. The
primary focus of this effort is to help the residential sector meet
the National Construction Goals and the HUD National Home Ownership
Strategy by cutting costs (e.g., production, energy, and maintenance costs) through the introduction of innovations
in technology and practice. This program is expected to favorably
impact competitiveness, affordable housing and the environment.
State governments have increasingly vital roles to play in the
national system of S&T as the traditional division of effort among
Federal and State governments shift. States have better knowledge of
industry needs in their jurisdiction and financing and venture capital
availability to commercialize innovations to support their economic
development goals. In response to the States heightened interests in
S&T as part of their economic development plans, the State-Federal
Technology Partnerships (SFTP), now known as the United States
Innovation Partnership (USIP), was initiated. The Assistant to the
President for Science and Technology coordinates the Federal
participation and interface with the States on this initiative.
A task force co-chaired by former Governors Celeste and
Thornburgh was commissioned to recommend actions to be undertaken to
create a partnership to combine the talents and infrastructure of
State and Federal governments in planning and executing S&T programs.
The task force issued their final report in September 19959. In an
effort to implement the recommendations contained in this report, the
Assistant to the President for Science and Technology appointed Dr.
Mary Good, Under Secretary for Technology at the Department of
Commerce, to chair an NSTC working group on State-Federal Technology
Partnerships (STFP). The working group was tasked to establish a
framework for multiagency collaboration with the States in deploying
technology to promote economic development and to identify and
initiate partnership programs in several S&T priority areas.
Key departments and agencies participating in USIP include: the
Department of Commerce; the National Science Foundation; the
Environmental Protection Agency; the Small Business Administration;
the Department of Energy; the Department of Defense; the Department of
Transportation; the Department of Labor; the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration; the National Institutes of Health; and the
Department of Education.
Accomplishments. In March 1996, the Assistant to the President for Science and
Technology invited Governor Tommy Thompson, then chair of National
Governors Association (NGA), to a White House conference where
Governors expressing interest in the SFTP and Federal officials, with
major responsibilities for S&T programs, would convene to establish an
organization under which the partnership would operate. In
preparation for the conference, task forces were appointed, consisting
of both State and Federal members, to prepare issue papers in four
potential areas of technology partnerships: 1) regulatory innovation;
2) technology partnerships and manufacturing; 3) capital formation;
and 4) information infrastructure.
These issue papers were presented at regional meetings to solicit
input from a wide audience (Hartford, Connecticut, December 1996; Las Vegas, Nevada and Kansas
City, Missouri, January 1997). While working to formalize a
partnership organization, an on-line information network is being
built for partnership participants. One component of this network is
a compilation of all State and Federal manufacturing development and
outreach activities active at this time.
The Administration is evaluating the near- and long-term
potential for biomass to serve as a major fuel source for electricity
generation, and for converting biomass fuels for transportation. A
carefully designed program could result in a new source of income for
farmers and farm communities while reducing greenhouse gas emissions
and oil imports. This initiative involves continued research into
feedstock development and conversion of biomass to electricity and
fuels. A major element of this initiative has been the cooperative
agreement between the Departments of Energy and Agriculture in the
Biomass for Rural Development Program. Through this program,
solicitations for pilot projects were issued with a goal to develop
and ultimately commercialize biomass energy systems.
Accomplishments. Three pilot biomass energy projects were funded in 1996 through
cooperative agreements with the Departments of Energy and Agriculture.
The first project, with the Salix Corporation of New York, seeks to
use willow feedstocks to produce power directly and through cofiring.
The second project, with the Minnesota Valley Alfalfa Producers, seeks
to develop an integrated alfalfa processing and biomass power system
using integrated gasification combined-cycle technology. The third
project, with the Iowa-Charlton Valley Partnership, seeks to use
underutilized marginal conservation reserve program cropland to grow
switchgrass for use in generating power through cofiring at an
existing coal-fired facility. Each of these projects, expected to
achieve their objectives by the year 2001, will contribute
significantly toward demonstrating the feasibility of these
technologies, increasing understanding of the problems, and reducing
the costs associated with biomass energy systems.
Sustained growth and competitiveness of electronics manufacturing
in the U.S. are vital contributors to the strength of the overall U.S.
economy. This initiative supports a public-private partnership
focused on leveraging resources in electronics manufacturing with a
goal to create an environment that is competitive, even in low margin
consumer electronics markets.
Accomplishments. The NSTC's Electronics Subcommittee of the Committee on
Technological Innovation undertook an initiative with the American
Electronics Association (AEA) to develop a research partnership with
the Nation's electronics manufacturing industry. This effort came to
fruition on March 13, 1996, with the announcement of National
Electronics Manufacturing Initiative, Incorporated (NEMI). NEMI is a
consortium created to ensure the sustained growth and competitiveness
of electronics manufacturing in the U.S. NEMI is an industry-funded,
industry-led, private-public partnership that brings together the largest electronic equipment
manufacturers in the U.S. and their key suppliers with government
agencies to foster development of the world's best electronics
manufacturing supply chain. NEMI will improve manufacturing
technology by establishing development and implementation projects
between users and suppliers. In addition, NEMI has identified key R&D
activities which will require the coordination of its members and
outside organizations. NEMI is working with Government and
non-government organizations including the NSTC, OSTP, Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Semiconductor Industry
Association (SIA) and SEMATECH to establish linkages to ensure this
coordination. NEMI is a prime example of the NSTC providing an
initial Federal Government impetus and moving forward to a non-
government activity.
The Global Positioning System (GPS) was designed as a dual-use
system with the primary purpose of enhancing the effectiveness of U.S.
and allied military forces. GPS is also rapidly becoming an integral
component of the emerging Global Information Infrastructure (GII),
with applications ranging from mapping and surveying to international
air traffic management and global change research. The growing demand
from military, civil, commercial, and scientific users has generated a
U.S. commercial GPS equipment and service industry that leads the
world, making it essential to articulate a clear statement of national
policy on the future of GPS. OSTP/NSTC and the National Security
Council (NSC) were tasked to co-chair an interagency working group to
review GPS policy issues and make appropriate recommendations for
national policy on the future management and use of GPS.
Accomplishments. On March 29, 1996, the President approved a new national policy
on the future management and use of the GPS, PDD NSTC-6. The
President's policy will open the door for rapid growth in a burgeoning
civil and commercial GPS market, which already exceeds $1 billion per
year,and could add 100,000 jobs to the U.S. economy by the year 2000.
The Administration's Goals for a National Partnership in
Aeronautics Research and Technology10, prepared by the NSTC's Committee
on Transportation R&D in cooperation with industry and academia,
presents the Administration's vision and goals for future Federal
investments in aeronautics and aviation research and technology. The
research agenda outlined in this report is meant to achieve three
fundamental goals: 1) maintaining the superiority of U.S. aircraft
and engines; 2) improving the safety, efficiency, and cost
effectiveness of the global air transportation system; and 3) ensuring
the long-term environmental compatibility of the aviation system.
Accomplishments. Progress was made in fostering a renewed spirit of cooperation
and partnership in the fields of aeronautics and aerospace R&D.
During 1996, a number of Memoranda of Understanding were developed
between NASA and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in areas
ranging from advanced air traffic technologies to general aviation and
human factors.
After a comprehensive NSTC/National Security Council review of
the U.S. space policy, including all previous Presidential directives
affecting the civil, commercial, and national security space sector,
it became clear that many were not consistent with the priorities of
the Clinton Administration.
Accomplishments. The President issued a Presidential Decision Directive (PDD NSTC-
8) to update the national space policy to be consistent with the
Administration's civilian, national security, and commercial space
programs and policies.
Today's transportation system is structurally, mechanically, and
technologically sound. Now, the greatest challenge is to ensure it is
fully designed for human operators, maintainers, and users.
Government agencies must work in partnership with industry and
academia to maintain and improve the safety and productivity of the
U.S. transportation systems in order to realize the world's safest,
most responsive and competitive transportation system by considering
human behavior in all aspects, now and in the future.
Accomplishments. The brochure Human-Centered Transportation11 outlines the goals of
this initiative:
- Focus multi-agency resources to realize the world's safest and
most accessible transportation system.
- Refine techniques for reducing operator error in safety-critical
decision situations and characterize the role of automation.
- Expand transportation system access for diverse and physically-
challenged populations.
- Enhance passenger protection against accidents and crime.
In August 1996, the NSTC Committee on Transportation created a
planning team to examine the specific issue of how insights into human
factors could be used to improve transportation safety. The Human-
Centered Transportation Safety Team offered preliminary
recommendations in November 1996, forming key input to a
Transportation Technology Strategy to be finalized in 1997.
Through scientific discovery and technological innovation, humans
enlist the forces of the natural world to solve many of the uniquely
human problems we face--feeding and providing energy to a growing
population, improving human health, taking responsibility for
protecting the environment and the global ecosystem and ensuring our
own Nation's security. Investment in S&T aimed at helping the
economy, jobs, and the environment must be matched by investments in
the people who must introduce and operate new technologies and perform
the future research needed to maintain U.S. leadership. Since
virtually every job in the U.S. will be transformed by new technology
during the decades to come, the demands that will be placed on the
U.S. education system have increased. Federal efforts in education
focus in two areas: 1) using technology to increase the productivity
of education at all levels, and ensuring that learners in all
locations, with all kinds of backgrounds, are able to receive
instruction shaped for their unique needs and interests, and 2)
ensuring that Americans have an education in science, mathematics, and
engineering needed to prosper in an economy where sophisticated
technology and quantitative skills will be an integral part of most
employment.
Past investments to create the health, safety, and food knowledge
base of today have enjoyed broad public and bipartisan support and
have proven to be among the most cost-effective ever made. The NSTC
Committee on Health, Safety, and Food has developed a research agenda
for maintaining and improving America's health and food supply. The
goals include creating fundamental knowledge, promoting prevention,
disseminating information broadly and rapidly, and improving education
in the areas of health, safety, and food.
Accomplishments. The NSTC Committee on Health, Safety, and Food developed the
policy document, Meeting the Challenge12, reflecting public stakeholder
views expressed at a November 1994 forum related to improvements in
health and quality of life. This policy document lays out the
following five initiatives: 1) establish the Presidential Early
Career Scientist Award; 2) strengthen domestic health, safety, and
food data systems; 3) strengthen the integrated, multidisciplinary
human nutrition research initiative; 4) develop an integrated research
agenda to develop technologies to assure the safety and quality of
food for consumers; and 5) develop methods for assessing exposures and
other factors influencing health.
Producing the world's finest scientists and engineers for the
21st century and helping all Americans achieve basic scientific
literacy are two central goals of the Administration's S&T policy.
The Presidential Awards for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and
Engineering Mentoring program was established in 1996 as one strategy
to achieve the goal of developing a pool of highly trained scientists
and engineers that reflects the Nation's diverse population. This
award is presented to individuals who have demonstrated outstanding
and sustained mentoring and provided effective guidance to a
significant number of students at the K-12, undergraduate, or graduate
level. Institutions or organizations that have outstanding records in
mentoring students from underrepresented groups (e.g., minorities,
women, and persons with disabilities) toward significant achievement
in science, mathematics, and engineering are also eligible.
Approximately 10 individual and 10 institutional awards are expected
to be made each year.
Accomplishments. In September 1996, President Clinton named 10 individual and six
institutional recipients of the first Presidential Awards for
Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring. The
winners were selected from 131 nominees, which included 90 individuals
and 40 institutions, by leaders in the community using National
Science Foundation review procedures.
President Clinton approved this new awards program for early
investigators across Government agencies on February 1, 1996. The
purpose of this award is to recognize demonstrated excellence and
promise of future success in scientific or engineering research, and
the potential for eventual leadership of the recipients in their
respective fields. Maintaining leadership across the frontiers of
scientific knowledge and producing the finest scientists and engineers
for the 21st century, two of the five goals enunciated in the NSTC's
Science in the National Interest13, are both significantly served by this award.
Accomplishments. In December 1996, the President selected 60 individuals to
receive the first annual Presidential Early Career Awards for
Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). These young researchers are
recognized as having the potential to become the future leaders in
S&T, university faculties, and Nobel laureates. The recipients were
nominated by the following agencies/departments: 1) the Department of
Agriculture; 2) the Department of Commerce; 3) the Department of
Defense; 4) the Department of Energy; 5) the Department of Veterans
Affairs; 6) the Environmental Protection Agency; 7) the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration; 8) the National Institutes of
Health; 9) the Department of Health and Human Services; and 10) the
National Science Foundation.
Many of the Nation's most serious health and social problems
result from certain risk behaviors and environmental conditions that
have their roots in childhood. Many of these negative consequences
are preventable. This children's health initiative will result in a
federally-sponsored research agenda that: 1) reviews the methods and
measurements used in studying health problems of childhood and
adolescence; 2) examines the basic behavioral and social science
underpinnings of effective preventive programs; 3) supports research
on the etiology and prevention of risk behaviors; and 4) advances
research on the interplay between environmental conditions and
childhood health problems.
Accomplishments. The NSTC Committees on Health, Safety, and Food and on
Fundamental Science co-sponsored the National Research Initiative for
Children for the 21st Century to examine the research agenda on the
biological, cognitive, and social development of America's children
and adolescents. With OSTP leadership, this work was undertaken by a
working group, chaired by representatives from the Environmental
Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, and the National
Institutes of Health, with representation from all Federal
stakeholders in research on children, including the Domestic Policy
Council. The size and scope of the Federal research portfolio on
children and adolescents has been assessed, and gaps in the current
knowledge base and in research funding have been identified. The
research priorities of the Federal agencies were reviewed and
recommendations were formulated for sustainable collaborations and
communications within the Federal Government and for partnerships with
appropriate public and private sector parties. Recommendations were
also made regarding the use of research findings to improve the
quality of services and the formulation of policies regarding
children.
In 1996, President Clinton challenged the Nation's parents,
teachers, government, community, and business leaders to work together
to ensure that all American children are technologically literate by
the dawn of the 21st century--equipped with the communication, math,
science, and critical thinking skills essential for the 21st century
economy. He established four specific goals:
- Connect every school and classroom in America to the information
superhighway.
- Provide access to modern computers for all teachers and students.
- Develop effective and engaging software and on-line learning
resources as an integral part of the school curriculum.
- Provide all teachers the training and support they need to help
students learn through computers and the information superhighway.
Accomplishments. The work of the NSTC in this area has supported the President's
Educational Technology Initiative, launched in February 1996, and has
included public/private partnership activities such as NetDays, Tech
Corps, and America's Technology Literacy Challenge.
NetDay96 was a volunteer effort by California companies,
universities, parents, teachers, and engineers to install internal
wiring in California schools. On March 9, 1996, the President and
Vice President and more than 20,000 volunteers laid six million feet
of cable connecting thousands of California schools with the
technology needed to link classrooms, libraries, and laboratories to
the information superhighway. This effort sparked an enormous
response around the Nation and in the fall 1996, over 40 States
organized and participated in NetDays, wiring over 25,000 schools,
using over 250,000 volunteers. NetDays across the country will
continue in April 1997, bringing the Nation dramatically closer to our
goal of connecting all classrooms to the Net by the end of the decade.
The President announced the creation of the Tech Corps--a
national organization of private sector volunteers with technological
expertise dedicated to improving K-12 education at the local level.
Tech Corps was launched as a private-sector response to the
President's national mission to make all children technologically
literate by the dawn of the 21st century. Its purpose is to recruit,
place, and support volunteers from the private sector to advise and
assist schools in integrating new technologies into the classroom.
Official Tech Corps chapters have been formed in 35 States plus the
District of Columbia.
To implement his 1996 State of the Union proposal, President
Clinton asked Congress to fund a $2 billion, five-year Technology
Literacy Challenge designed to catalyze State, local, and private
sector partnerships in each State to achieve the four educational
technology goals. Congress supported the President's request and
appropriated $200 million in FY 1996 for the first installment of
funding for the five-year program that will provide State grants to
help fulfill this challenge.
Environmental issues and the scientific understanding needed to
address them are enormously complex. The dramatic increase in world
population and industrial activities during the last century are
affecting the environment in profound and potentially irreversible
ways. The future of the U.S. rests on understanding how to sustain
the bounty of natural resources our environment provides.
Improving environmental quality requires supporting a broad and
comprehensive research agenda, including observing, documenting,
understanding, assessing and predicting environmental change and its
consequences; using natural resources in a sustainable manner;
understanding and preserving biodiversity; and developing analytical
tools that integrate social, economic and natural sciences to support
policy formation. Improving environmental quality also requires the
implementation of scientifically-based decisions that would prevent or
mitigate activities that adversely affect public health or ecological
systems.
Environmental technologies are the bridge to a sustainable future
that will facilitate the achievement of long-term environmental,
energy, and economic goals. As a follow-on action from the policy
document Technology for a Sustainable Future: A Framework for
Action14, the NSTC established a national strategy for environmental
technologies with goals to: 1) facilitate the development and
deployment of environmental technologies; 2) provide better access to
Federal environmental technology programs; 3) support technology
verification and demonstration; 4) enhance export promotion for U.S.
technology; and 5) identify and reduce regulatory barriers impeding
the use and financing of innovative environmental technologies.
Accomplishments. Following a series of workshops held across the country with more
than 1000 key stakeholders, the NSTC hosted a White House Conference
with 200 high-level representatives from industry, non-governmental
organizations, and State and local governments, to facilitate a
dialogue and build a consensus on how to improve Federal policies and
procedures related to the development and deployment of environmental
technologies. A number of non-Federal representatives at this
conference inquired about how to partner with the Federal Government
to test their technologies. In response, Environmental Technologies
Testing and Demonstration Sites: A Federal Directory15 was compiled
and distributed, listing over 100 sites at Federal facilities around
the country where the private sector can partner with the Government
to demonstrate new approaches to remediation, monitoring, pollution
control, or prevention.
A fundamental improvement in the way the U.S. monitors its
environment is required to meet the challenges of the next several
decades. Current monitoring programs do not provide integrated data
across multiple natural resources at the various temporal and spatial
scales needed to develop policies based on current scientific
understanding of ecosystem processes. An integrated framework for
environmental monitoring and assessment will enable the evaluation of
the Nation's natural resources and their sustainability on national
and regional scales. Such an integrated framework is essential for an
accurate description of environmental conditions. Current programs,
while effective at tracking specific components of the ecosystems,
often are deficient in providing information on how different
components interact.
Accomplishments. The NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural Resources fostered
an interagency effort to integrate the Nation's environmental
monitoring and related research. Coordination of the 15,000
Federal environmental monitoring sites and the approximately $650
million annual expenditures will enable policymakers to better
understand the causes and effects of environmental change and the
ability to predict how an action will affect the health of ecosystems
in the future. A framework for this integration is being developed
and will be published in Spring 1997. A Mid-Atlantic Regional
Workshop, held in April 1996, laid the basis for a pilot demonstration
project. A national workshop, with representatives from State and
local governments, industry, non-governmental organizations, and
academic experts, was held in September 1996, to build the broadest
possible foundation for integrating national monitoring efforts.
Although earthquakes are inevitable natural hazards, they need
not be inevitable disasters. Through prudent actions, the U.S. can
reduce losses of life, casualties, property losses, and social and
economic disruptions from future earthquakes. The NSTC has
established a goal to reduce the cost of natural disasters to the U.S.
economy through support of a coordinated multidisciplinary, multi-
agency research program. Key aspects of this program include
focusing R&D efforts on improving future risk assessment and risk
management capabilities, and improvement of analytical, modeling,
forecasting, and information dissemination tools.
Accomplishments. Following a thorough review of the U.S. earthquake policy by the
NSTC National Earthquake Strategy Working Group, Strategy for National
Earthquake Loss Reduction17 was developed. This strategy recommends
the establishment of a National Earthquake Loss Reduction Program
(NEP), under the leadership of the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, designed to strengthen and extend the National Earthquake
Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). The NEP would aim to:
1) focus scarce R&D dollars on the most effective means for saving
lives and property and limiting the social disruptions from
earthquakes; 2) coordinate Federal mitigation R&D and emergency
planning in a number of agencies beyond those represented in the
NEHRP; and 3) disseminate existing information to the user community
and cooperate with the private sector and State and local
jurisdictions to apply effective mitigation strategies and measures.
To address public concerns and to take full advantage of the
extensive expertise across the Federal Government, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) requested the assistance of the NSTC Committee
on Environment and Natural Resources to coordinate a comprehensive
assessment of the winter oxygenated gasoline program. The use of
oxygenated gasoline was mandated under the Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990 in areas of the country that did not meet the Federal ambient air
standard for carbon monoxide. Soon after the oxygenated gasoline
program was introduced nationally in the winter
of 1992-1993, anecdotal reports of acute health symptoms were received
by health authorities in various areas of the country and complaints
were voiced about reduced fuel economy and engine performance.
Accomplishments. To address public concerns, an NSTC steering committee performed
an assessment on the health effects from exposure to evaporative and
exhaust emissions from oxygenated gasoline and reported their findings
in Interagency Assessment of Potential Health Risks Associated with
Oxygenated Gasoline18. The development of an expanded assessment
report was initiated soon after. To enhance the information on the
health effects in the expanded report, each chapter of Interagency
Assessment of Potential Health Risks Associated with Oxygenated
Gasoline underwent extensive external peer-review prior to review of
the entire report by the National Research Council (NRC) of the
National Academy of Sciences. The NRC review was completed in June
1996 and, for the most part, the NRC concurred with the NSTC
assessment. The expanded assessment report, to be released to the
public in the Spring of 1997, will take into consideration the
findings and comments from the NRC review and will also include
evaluations on the effects of oxygenated gasoline on air quality,
water quality, fuel economy, and engine performance. This report will
help inform EPA decisionmakers on the impacts of using oxygenated
gasoline and has the potential to influence future decisions relative
to the wintertime oxygenate program.
The Federal Government supports a diverse array of R&D, providing
the scientific and technical information needed to address environment
and natural resources issues from global climate change to toxic waste
remediation. Merit-based competitive award of funding is a critical
aspect of maintaining the highest standard of excellence in this
endeavor. In order to provide the research community with
comprehensive information about the scope and content of competitive
funding opportunities, the NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural
Resources compiled and published the first-ever guide to Federally-
funded environment and natural resources R&D.
Accomplishments. A Program Guide to Federally Funded Environment and Natural
Resources R&D19 provides information to colleges, universities, and
other research institutions on programs within Federal agencies that
fund R&D in environment and natural resources areas. It describes the
general competitive process of merit review and evaluation for the
types of environment and natural resources research that is supported
by Federal agencies. It provides researchers with an understanding of
the scope of Federally-funded environment and natural resources
research, and potential funding opportunities. This compendium will
be updated and published on a yearly basis and available on the
Internet through the NSTC Home Page.
Endocrine disruptors are chemicals present in the environment in
low concentrations as pollutants, such as DDT, dioxins, PCBs,
phthalates and pharmaceuticals, that may affect the endocrine systems
of vertebrates. Hormones produced by the endocrine system control
many aspects of growth, development, and reproduction in vertebrates.
Endocrine disruptors are important because any chemical that has the
ability to mimic or interfere with the action of hormones has the
potential to have major effects on human health and survival of
wildlife. Consequences of such exposures may include hormone related
problems such as decreased fertility, certain types of cancer (i.e.,
breast and testicular) and wildlife population loss. The development
of a research strategy and program to measure and understand the human
health and ecological effects of environmental exposures to endocrine
disruptors is needed to address this issue.
Accomplishments. An NSTC working group, established under the auspices of the
Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, developed a planning
framework for Federal research related to the human health and
ecological effect of endocrine disrupting chemicals and conducted an
inventory of on-going Federal research programs. The framework, The
Health and Ecological Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals: A
Framework for Planning20, reviews the current state of the science and
major uncertainties related to endocrine disrupting chemicals and, in
a preliminary way, identifies research areas in need of attention. In
conjunction with the inventory, the framework will be used to identify
research gaps and to develop a coordinated interagency plan by Spring
1997.
Information technology has the potential to promote economic
growth, expand opportunities for learning, protect the environment,
and improve our national security. For that reason, the Clinton
Administration has made the development and use of information
technology one of its top priorities and is working in a number of
areas to promote deployment of the Global Information Infrastructure,
a Anetwork of networks" that will connect every town and village
worldwide.
While the private sector will build and run the Global
Information Infrastructure, the Federal Government has a number of
important roles to play, including the funding of computing and
communications research in our universities, Federal labs, and
companies. One of the reasons the U.S. is predominant in so many
aspects of information technology is because of the billions of
dollars that the Federal Government invested in research in this area
and close cooperation between researchers in Government, industry, and
academia.
The Federal High Performance Computing and Communications (HPCC)
Program coordinates Federal efforts to accelerate progress in the
crucial areas of computation, information, and communications. By
facilitating deployment of easy-to-use information technology, this
program has clearly generated important societal benefits and
encouraged the information revolution. The Federal HPCC Program,
initiated in the 1991 HPCC Act, marked its fifth year in October 1996.
Continued R&D in high performance computing, communications, and
information technology is needed to sustain America's leadership in
the Information Age.
Accomplishments. The recent accomplishments of the HPCC program are described in
the supplement to the President's 1997 Budget: Advancing the
Frontiers of Information Technology21. The program plans and goals for
the coming year are outlined in the HPCC 1997 Implementation Plan22.
Additionally, the NSTC Committee on Computing, Information, and
Communications (CCIC) sponsored several HPCC-related events during
1996:
- PetaFlops Architecture WorkShop (PAWS), April 1996
- PetaSoft Systems Software Summer Study (PetaSoft '96), June 1996
- Workshop on Software Tools for High Performance Computing
Systems, co-sponsored by the High End Computing and Computation
Working Group of the Computing, Information, and Communications R&D
Subcommittee of the CCIC, October 1996
- A research exhibit at Supercomputing '96, the premier U.S.
conference on high performance computing, November 1996
The Administration's National Information Infrastructure (NII)
initiative was launched to ensure the development of an NII that
enables all Americans to access information and communicate with each
other using voice, data, images, or video at anytime, anywhere. The
NSTC Committee on Computing, Information, and Communications has been
involved in coordinating the Federal R&D efforts for the
Administration's NII initiative.
Accomplishments. Throughout 1996, the NSTC Committee on Computing, Information,
and Communications provided advice to the Office of Management and
Budget, OSTP, and the NII Advisory Committee on new technological
developments. By working with the mission agencies, the committee
helped to coordinate the Federal telecommunications and information
technology investments. Through this coordination, the technologies
required for the high-speed communications infrastructure were
defined.
The Administration launched the Global Information Infrastructure
(GII) Initiative in February 1995 to foster the cooperation necessary
to spur the transformation of regions split into thousands of discrete
networks and incompatible information resources into a global
community connected by a unified information infrastructure. In order
to implement the Administration's GII Initiative, the NSTC Committee
on Computing, Information, and Communications has been actively
involved in coordinating Federal high performance network R&D. The
research agenda includes technologies that enable wireless, optical,
mobile, and wireline communications.
Accomplishments. Throughout 1996, the NSTC Committee on Computing, Information,
and Communications has coordinated Federal investments in large scale
network engineering, management, and services, and systems software
and program development environments for network-centric computing.
The Committee worked with the mission agencies to eliminate
duplication and identify areas where additional R&D investments are
required.
VI. Enhancing National Security and Global Stability
The defense of the U.S. and the protection of American interests
abroad are fundamental responsibilities of the Federal Government.
National security and global stability are critical areas where
international S&T collaboration and interagency coordination are
needed for progress. Collaboration and coordination are needed
because the issues faced cannot be solved through the efforts of a
single country or a single agency. Threats to human health and
safety, such as diseases and natural disasters, do not recognize
national borders and require international coordination and effective
application of S&T to address. International S&T relations have
become an integral part of the overall U.S. foreign policy and plays a
vital role in the nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction,
arms control, meeting the challenges of global threats, and
strengthening economic security.
Emerging infectious diseases--new, resurgent, or drug resistant
infections of which incidence in humans has increased within the past
two decades or threatens to increase in the near future--present one of the most significant health challenges facing the
global community. To address this issue, the NSTC developed a
detailed action plan for implementation of the recommendations made in
its report, Infectious Disease--A Global Health Threat23. The actions
were classified as administrative, budgetary, and legislative and
called for strengthened efforts in research and training. Progress on
these actions will lead to improved national and international
monitoring and surveillance. An international priority, Emerging
Infectious Disease, recognizes the domestic, international and
security dimensions of the threat posed.
Accomplishments. On June 12, 1996, Vice President Gore announced a Presidential
Decision Directive (PDD NSTC-7) on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious
Diseases. This PDD calls for strengthening the U.S. ability to
respond to the growing global threat of emerging and re-emerging
infectious diseases. This policy is based on the recommendations of
the report, Infectious Disease--A Global Health Threat. The
priorities of this policy initiative include:
- Strengthen domestic infectious disease surveillance and response,
at the Federal, State, and local levels and at ports of entry into the
U.S.
- Work with other nations and international organizations to
establish a global infectious disease surveillance and response
system.
- Strengthen research activities to improve diagnostics, treatment
and prevention, and to improve the understanding of the biology of
infectious agents.
- Ensure the availability of the drugs, vaccines, and diagnostic
tests needed to combat infectious diseases and infectious disease
emergencies through public and private sector cooperation.
- Expand missions and establish the authority of relevant U.S.
Government agencies to contribute to a worldwide infectious disease
surveillance, prevention, and response network.
- Promote public awareness of emerging infectious diseases through
cooperation with non-governmental organizations and the private
sector.
Since the announcement of the PDD: 1) the National Institutes of
Health announced new programmatic efforts to strengthen international
cooperation in emerging infectious disease research and training,
including the establishment of four new Cooperative Research Centers
and three new Emerging Virus Groups; and 2) The Emerging Infectious
Diseases Task Force, under the auspices of the NSTC Committee on
International Science, Engineering, and Technology, has drafted a
surveillance and response implementation plan, including specific work
plans to address antibiotic resistance, product availability, and
communications.
Although natural disasters are not frequent events in a given
locality, they are common events globally. The data, knowledge,
procedures, facilities and technologies developed internationally are
essential resources for effectively mitigating the damage caused by
these events. U.S. engagement abroad also enhances stability, reduces
through preventative means the resources contributed to mitigating the
effects of international disasters, and strengthens U.S. foreign
policy. Natural disaster mitigation is an effort broader than any
single nation's or agency's interest and is an area in which advances
in S&T can significantly improve prediction and response.
Accomplishments. Recognizing that natural disasters cause the loss of thousands of
lives and hundreds of billions of dollars in damage annually
worldwide, an interagency working group was formed under the auspices
of the NSTC (co-sponsored by the Committees on Environment and Natural
Resources and International Science, Engineering, and Technology) to
consider ways in which U.S. engagement internationally in the S&T of
natural disaster reduction can be more fully exploited to reduce the
costs to life and property from natural disasters at home and abroad.
Strategic coordination was provided for the Administration's S&T
relations with priority nations and regions through the NSTC's
Committee on International Science, Engineering and Technology.
Through the NSTC interagency process, international S&T relations have
been more fully integrated into our overall foreign policy and
specifically sharpened with Japan, Russia, China, South Africa, the
European Union, as well as the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum
and the Summit of the Americas.
Accomplishments. Coordinated U.S. positions were developed for Ministerial
meetings on S&T with the nations and regions noted above. In the case
of China, this effort contributed to the five-year renewal of the U.S.-
China Science and Technology Agreement.
The Nonproliferation and Arms Control Technology Working Group
(NPAC TWG) is the designated mechanism for the President to coordinate
all Federally-funded R&D supporting the controlling of arms and
stemming the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The NPAC
TWG systematically inventories programs, coordinates among departments
and agencies, identifies gaps and overlaps, highlights areas in need
of high-level attention, and makes recommendations for maximizing the
effectiveness of the total program. It has made a substantial
contribution to ensuring the effectiveness of nonproliferation and
arms-control-related R&D.
Accomplishments. The NPAC TWG completed its second year of operation. Its
classified reports--the annual NPAC TWG summary, the report of the
Technology Needs Subcommittee, and the focus group reports--represent
the best source of detailed interagency budget crosscuts in
nonproliferation and arms control R&D. These crosscuts allow OSTP to
effectively assess and articulate how the total program meets the
President's goals in this area. The NPAC reports to the NSTC
Committee on National Security.
President Clinton established the President's Committee of
Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) at the same time that he
established the NSTC to advise the President on matters involving S&T
and to assist the NSTC in securing private sector involvement in its
activities. The PCAST, which consists of distinguished individuals
from industry, education, and research institutions, and other non-
governmental organizations, serves as the highest level private sector
advisory group for the President and the NSTC. The PCAST held two
plenary sessions in 1996 and issued three reports to the President:
1) Principles on the U.S. Government's Investment Role in Technology
(June 1996); 2) Letter Report on Research Universities (June 1996); and 3) Preventing Deadly Conflict (November, 1996).
PCAST is co-chaired by the Assistant to the President for Science
and Technology,
Dr. John H. Gibbons, and Mr. John Young, former President and Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) of Hewlett-Packard Co. The membership
includes:
- Norman Augustine, Chairman of the Board and CEO, Lockheed Martin
Corporation
- Francisco Ayala, Professor, University of California, Irvine
- Murray Gell-Mann, Professor, Santa Fe Institute and Professor
Emeritus, California Institute of Technology
- David Hamburg, President, Carnegie Corporation of New York
- John Holdren, Professor, Harvard University
- Diana MacArthur, Chair and CEO, Dynamac Corporation
- Shirley Malcom, Directorate Head, American Association for the
Advancement of Science
- Mario Molina, Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Peter Raven, Director, Missouri Botanical Garden
- Sally Ride, Director, California Space Institute, and Professor,
University of California - San Diego
- Judith Rodin, President, University of Pennsylvania
- Charles A. Sanders, Former Chairman and CEO, Glaxo-Wellcome, Inc.
- Phillip Sharp, Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- David Shaw, CEO, D.E. Shaw and Co.
- Charles Vest, President, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Virginia Weldon, Senior Vice President, Monsanto Company
- Lilian Shiao-Yen Wu, Research Staff, Thomas J. Watson Research
Center, IBM
The Committee's fifth and sixth plenary sessions were held April
18-19, 1996, and
September 16-17, 1996, respectively. At the April meeting, PCAST
returned to the issue of reviewing the Federal R&D budget priorities,
but focused more narrowly on how various Federal Government agencies
support research universities in their budgets. In addition, they
reviewed drafts from several of the PCAST working groups, reviewed
progress on NSTC initiatives, and received briefings by the OSTP
Associate Directors on new NSTC initiatives. At the September
meeting, PCAST sponsored a "round-table" with invited university
presidents, corporate executives, and Nobel laureates to discuss key
issues on university-Government partnerships. PCAST also discussed
S&T issues related to improving international cooperation.
During 1996, in addition to providing informal advice to the
President and several Federal agencies, writing letters, and working
with Congress to help its members understand the importance of the S&T
enterprise to the Nation's security and economic growth, PCAST issued
the following three reports to the President:
- Principles on the U.S. Government's Investment Role in
Technology (June 1996) provides criteria to be used by policymakers in
identifying essential investments in technology, as well as targets of
opportunity for support. The transmittal letter underscores the
importance of these investments for the Nation's economic security.
Copies of the Principles were also forwarded to members of Congress
with a special interest in or responsibility for S&T issues.
- Letter Report on Research Universities (June 1996) concluded that
the stresses on these institutions threaten their two fundamental
missions: 1) discovery of new knowledge; and 2) preparation of the
next generation. PCAST recommended that the Federal Government
initiate a full policy and administrative review, including its
current policies, programs, and regulations affecting the university-
Government partnership, and that the results of this review be
reported to the President. In response to this letter report, as well
as to similar letters from corporate leaders and Nobel laureates, the
President directed the NSTC to issue a Presidential Review Directive
(PRD NSTC-4), Review of the University-Government Partnership, calling
for an assessment by June 1997. Actions recommended could then be
incorporated into agency budget planning for FY 1999.
- Preventing Deadly Conflict (November, 1996) concluded that: 1) scientific research can clarify the causes of deadly conflict at the
individual, group, and international levels; 2) R&D sharpen the
concepts and techniques of conflict resolution; 3) application of
research can diminish the development of prejudice and ethnocentrism
during childhood and adolescence; and 4) international cooperation
among scientists can help prevent deadly conflict. PCAST recommended
that the Administration support enhanced activities in each of these
areas as well as encourage ongoing efforts already underway at several
U.S. Government agencies. Furthermore, PCAST recommended that the
NSTC should coordinate the efforts across the Government.
For Copies of PCAST Reports and Letters and Further Information,
Contact:
PCAST Executive Secretariat
202-456-6100 (phone) 202-456-6026 (fax)
Also Available on the PCAST Home Page via Link from the OSTP Home Page
at:
/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/OSTP_Home.html
(as of December 31, 1996)
NSTC PRDs:
- Federal Laboratories, dated 5/5/94--Interagency review of the
Department of Defense (DoD) the Department of Energy (DOE) and the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)--the three
largest laboratory systems--to evaluate and develop recommendations
for ways to improve their efficiency and effectiveness. The NSTC's
review provides guidance, building upon and integrating the
individual agency reviews. Completion of review led to PDD-5.
- Space Policy dated, 5/15/95--Comprehensive review of national
space policy identifying and recommending changes and ensuring
written policies reflect the Administration's civilian, national
security, and commercial space programs and policies. Identifies
and recommends changes to related national security directives
containing guidance on space policies and programs. Completion of
review led to PDD-8.
- Global Positioning System (GPS) Policy Review, dated 5/18/95--
Review of GPS policy issues and recommendations on national policy
on the future management and use of GPS. Considers national
security, economic policy and foreign policy issues. Completion of
review led to PDD-6.
- Review of the University-Government Partnership, dated 9/26/96--
A Government-wide policy and administration review of the U.S.
university research system. The NSTC will form a task force to
conduct the review to determine what might be the major stresses in
the areas of research, education, and administrative regulations,
and determine what the Federal Government=s role should be in
addressing any issues raised by this examination.
Due 6/30/97.
NSTC PDDs:
- Establishment of Presidential Review and Decision Series/NSTC,
dated 1/25/94.
- Convergence of U.S. Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental
Satellite Systems, dated 5/5/94--Integrates the Department of
Commerce (DOC) and DoD polar-orbiting environmental satellite
systems to reduce the cost of acquisition and operation. Directs
DoD, NASA and DOC to: create an Integrated Program Office no later
than 10/1/94 and form a convergence Executive Committee to ensure
that both civil and national security requirements are satisfied;
coordinate program plans, budgets and policies; and ensure that
agency funding commitments are equitable and sustained.
- Landsat Remote Sensing Strategy, dated 5/5/94--Provides for
continuation of the Landsat 7 program, assuring continuity and
quality of Landsat-type data and reducing the risk of a data gap.
- National Space Transportation Policy, dated 8/5/94--Establishes
national policy, guidelines, and implementing actions for the
conduct of national space transportation programs that will sustain
and revitalize U.S. space transportation capabilities. Recognizes
criticality of space program for achieving national security,
scientific, technical, commercial and foreign policy goals. Assures
that reliable and affordable access to space through U.S. space
transportation capabilities is a fundamental goal of the U.S. space
program. Makes DoD the lead agency responsible for improvement and
evolution of current Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) fleet. Makes
NASA responsible for improving the space shuttle system, focusing on
reliability, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Assigns the Department
of Transportation (DOT) and DOC responsibility for private sector
and State/local government arrangements. Directs NASA and DoD to
develop a Memorandum of Agreement to consolidate future expendable
launch service requirements.
- Guidelines for Federal Laboratory Reform, dated 9/24/95--
Response to NSTC PRD 1. Review of DoD, DOE, and NASA, concluding
that these laboratories provide essential services to the Nation in
fundamental science, national security, environmental protection and
cleanup, and industrial competitiveness. States that all three DOE
nuclear weapons labs are essential. Directs DOE to maintain nuclear
weapons responsibilities and capabilities adequate to support the
science-based stockpile stewardship program required to ensure
continued confidence in the safety and reliability of the nuclear-
weapons stockpile in the absence of nuclear testing. Directs
Federal agencies to: 1) review and, as appropriate, rescind
internal management instructions and oversight that impede
laboratory performance; 2) clarify and focus the mission
assignments of their laboratories; and 3) achieve all possible
budget savings through streamlining and management improvements
before productive R&D programs are sacrificed.
- U.S. Global Positioning System Policy, dated 3/28/95--Response
to NSTC PRD 3. Establishes national policy for the management and
use of the U.S. GPS and related U.S. Government augmentations. The
policy presents a strategic vision for the future management and use
of GPS, addressing a broad range of military, civil, commercial and
scientific interests, both national and international.
- Emerging Infectious Diseases, dated 6/12/96--Establishes
national policy and implementing actions to address the threat of
emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases by improving
surveillance, prevention, and response measures. A Task Force under
the auspices of the NSTC will provide strategic planning and further
coordination on issues of emerging infectious diseases. The task
force will provide the President with annual reports on the progress
realized, including recommendations for further action.
- National Space Policy, dated 9/19/96--Response to NSTC PRD 2.
Updates the national space policy to be consistent with the
Administration=s civilian, national security, and commercial space
programs and policies.
For Fact Sheets and/or Press Releases on NSTC Presidential
Directives, Contact:
National Science and Technology Council Executive Secretariat
202-456-6100 (phone) 202-456-6026 (fax)
Appendix C
Reports Issued by
The National Science and Technology Council
Reports Issued by the National Science and Technology Council
(as of December 31, 1996)
- High Performance Computing and Communications Program
Successes, NSTC Committee on Computing, Information, and
Communications, June 1994
- High Performance Computing and Communications Technology for
the National Information Infrastructure, NSTC Committee on
Computing, Information, and Communications, 1994
- Technology for a Sustainable Future: A Framework for Action,
NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, July 1994
- Partnership of a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV) Program
Plan, NSTC Committee on Technological Innovation, July 1994
- Science in the National Interest, NSTC Committee on Fundamental
Science, August 1994
- A Strategic Planning Document for Meeting the 21st Century,
NSTC Committee on Education and Training, March 1995
- Preparing for the Future through Science and Technology, NSTC
Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, March 1995
- America in the Age of Information, NSTC Committee on Computing,
Information, and Communications, March 1995
- Bridge to a Sustainable Future, NSTC Committee on Environment
and Natural Resources, April 1995
- Interagency Federal Laboratory Review Final Report, NSTC
Federal Laboratory Review Working Group, May 1995
- High Performance Computing and Communications 1996
Implementation Plan, NSTC Committee on Computing, Information, and
Communications, May 1995
- High Performance Computing and Communications Foundation for
America's Information Future, NSTC Committee on Computing,
Information, and Communications, 1995
- Setting a New Course for U.S. Coastal Ocean Science, NSTC
Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, July 1995
- Biotechnology for the 21st Century: New Horizons, NSTC
Committee on Fundamental Science, July 1995
- Global Microbial Threats in the 1990's, NSTC Committee on
International Science, Engineering, and Technology, July 1995
- Goals for a National Partnership in Aeronautics Research and
Technology, NSTC Committee on Transportation, August 1995
- Infectious Disease--A Global Health Threat, NSTC Committee on
International Science, Engineering, and Technology, September 1995
- National Security Science and Technology Strategy, NSTC
Committee on National Security, September 1995
- National R&D Strategy for Toxic Substances and Hazardous Solid
Waste, NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural Resources,
September 1995
- Construction and Building: Federal Research and Development in
Support of the U.S. Construction Industry, NSTC Committee on
Technological Innovation, October 1995
- Forum on Future Directions in Transportation R&D, NSTC
Committee on Transportation, October 1995
- Our Changing Planet: The FY 1996 U.S. Global Change Research
Program, NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural Resources,
October 1995
- NSTC Accomplishments (November 1993 - September 1995), NSTC
Executive Secretariat, October 1995
- Interagency Report on Orbital Debris, NSTC Committee on
Transportation, November 1995
- Building a Scientific Basis to Ensure the Vitality and
Productivity of U.S. Ecosystems, NSTC Committee on Environment and
Natural Resources, December 1995
- National Planning for Construction and Building R&D, NSTC
Committee on Technological Innovation, December 1995
- Interagency Assessment of Potential Health Risks Associated
with Oxygenated Gasoline, NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural
Resources, February 1996
- Meeting the Challenge (A Research Agenda for America's Health,
Safety, and Food), NSTC Committee on Health, Safety, and Food,
February 1996
- United States Antarctic Program, NSTC Committee on Fundamental
Science, April 1996
- Strategy for National Earthquake Loss Reduction, NSTC Committee
on Environment and Natural Resources, April 1996
- NSTC Accomplishments--Calendar Year 1995, NSTC Executive
Secretariat, May 1996
- Human-Centered Transportation Systems Brochure, NSTC Committee
on Transportation, May 1996
- Assessing Fundamental Science Report, NSTC Committee on
Fundamental Science, July 1996
- Technology in the National Interest, NSTC Committee on
Technological Innovation, July 1996
- Program Guide to Federally Funded Environment and Natural
Resources R&D, NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural Resources,
June 1996
- Environmental Technologies Testing and Demonstration Sites: A
Federal Directory, NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural
Resources, September 1996
- Our Changing Planet: The FY 1997 U.S. Global Change Research
Program, NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural Resources,
September 1996
- Committee on Environment and Natural Resources Brochure, NSTC
Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, September 1996
- The Federal Research and Development Program in Materials
Science and Technology, NSTC Committee on Technological Innovation,
November 1996
- High Performance Computing and Communications (HPCC) Advancing
The Frontiers of Information Technology, NSTC Committee on
Computing, Information, and Communications, November 1996
- The Health and Ecological Effects of Endocrine Disrupting
Chemicals: A Framework for Planning, NSTC Committee on Environment
and Natural Resources, November 1996
Reports and Further Information May be Obtained by Contacting:
The NSTC Executive Secretariat
202-456-6100 (phone) 202-456-6026 (fax)
Reports are Also Available on the NSTC Home Page via Link from the
OSTP Home Page at:
/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/OSTP_Home.html
The President established the National Science and Technology
Council (NSTC) in 1993 to coordinate the diverse parts of the Federal
R&D enterprise and to foster synergy among the varied talents of the
Federal S&T workforce. In November 1996, the NSTC completed its third
year of operation and matured from the definition of strategic goals,
as defined in the 1995 NSTC committee strategic plans, to the
implementation of specific initiatives. The NSTC initiatives are
aimed at redirecting the Federal Government's investments in S&T
toward fundamental national goals, while streamlining Government and
saving taxpayers' dollars. This report presents the accomplishments
of the NSTC for 1996 according to the six Presidential goal areas for
R&D: 1) Maintaining World Leadership in Science, Mathematics, and
Engineering, 2) Promoting Long-term Economic Growth,
3) Sustaining a Healthy, Educated Citizenry, 4) Improving
Environmental Quality, 5) Harnessing Information Technology, and 6)
Enhancing National Security and Global Stability.
The accomplishments of the private sector President's Committee
on Science and Technology (PCAST) for 1996 are also included as
Appendix A of this report. PCAST was established at the same time as
the NSTC with a primary function to assist the NSTC to ensure that
Federal S&T policies reflect the full spectrum of the Nation's needs.
For Additional Copies and Further Information, Contact:
National Science and Technology Council Executive Secretariat
202-456-6100 (phone) 202-456-6026 (fax)
Also Available on the NSTC Home Page via Link from the OSTP Home Page
at:
/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/OSTP_Home.html
1 Science in the National Interest, NSTC Committee on
Fundamental Science, August 1994.
2 Assessing Fundamental Science, NSTC Committee on
Fundamental Science, July 1996.
3 NSTC Presidential Directives issued to date are
described in Appendix B.
4 In September 1995 the Senate VA, HUD, Independent
Agencies Appropriations Committee (Report 104-140) asked the NSTC to
review U.S. Antarctic policy.
5 United States Antarctic Program, NSTC Committee on
Fundamental Science, April 1996.
6 Technology in the National Interest, NSTC Committee on
Technological Innovation, July 1996
7 PNGV Technical Accomplishments Report, United States
Council for Automotive Research, July 1996.
8 Construction and Building: Federal Research and
Development in Support of the U.S. Construction Industry, NSTC Committee
on Technological Innovation, October 1995.
9 The State-Federal Technology Partnership Task Force
Final Report, State-Federal Technology Partnership Task Force, September
1995.
10 Goals for a National Partnership in Aeronautics
Research and Technology, NSTC Committee on Transportation, August 1995.
11 Human-Centered Transportation Systems Brochure, NSTC
Committee on Transportation, May 1996.
12 Meeting the Challenge (A Research Agenda for America's
Health, Safety, and Food), NSTC Committee on Health, Safety, and Food,
February 1996.
13 Science in the National Interest, NSTC Committee on
Fundamental Science, August 1994.
14 Technology for a Sustainable Future: A Framework for
Action, NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, July 1994.
15 Environmental Technologies Testing and Demonstration
Sites: A Federal Directory, NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural
Resources, September 1996.
16 This effort is linked to the International
Dimensions of Natural Disaster Reduction work cited in section VI of
this report on Enhancing National Security and Global Stability.
17 Strategy for National Earthquake Loss Reduction, NSTC
Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, April 1996.
18 Interagency Assessment of Potential Health Risks
Associated with Oxygenated Gasoline, NSTC Committee on Environment and
Natural Resources, February 1996.
19 Program Guide to Federally Funded Environment and
Natural Resources R&D, NSTC Committee on Environment and Natural
Resources, June 1996.
20 The Health and Ecological Effects of Endocrine
Disrupting Chemicals: A Framework for Planning, NSTC Committee on
Environment and Natural Resources, November 1996.
21 High Performance Computing and Communications (HPCC)
Advancing The Frontiers of Information Technology, NSTC Committee on
Computing, Information, and Communications, November 1996.
22 HPCC 1997 Implementation Plan , Office for Computing,
Information, and Communications, December 1996.
23 Infectious Disease--A Global Health Threat, NSTC
Committee on International Science, Engineering, and Technology,
September 1995.
24 This effort is linked to the Natural Disaster Reduction
work cited in section IV of this report on Improving Environmental Quality.
President and First Lady | Vice President and Mrs. Gore Record of Progress | The Briefing Room Gateway to Government | Contacting the White House White House for Kids | White House History White House Tours | Help | Text Only Privacy Statement | |