|
Calendar Year (CY)
1995 NSTC Accomplishments
Joint NSTC-OMB Fiscal Year (FY) 1997 R&D Budget Priorities
On April 28, 1995, Alice M. Rivlin, the Director of OMB, and I issued
joint budget guidance to the Head of Executive Departments and Agencies.
Our intent was to convey the guiding principles developed by the NSTC and
approved at the March 23, 1995, NSTC Deputies Meeting. Agencies were
expected to reflect these principles and priorities in their FY 1997
budget submittal. The NSTC developed six budget R&D priorities
which remained unchanged from FY 1996:
- Maintain World Leadership in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics
- Promote Long-term Economic Growth that Creates Jobs
- Sustain a Healthy, Educated Citizenry
- Harness Information Technology
- Improve Environmental Quality
- Enhance National Security
R&D budget data collection guidelines were concurrently issued. Data
collection goals and principles were established to streamline the data
collection process and implement lessons learned from the prior year.
For example, the number of priority/crosscut areas was reduced
from 8 to 7; OMB Circular A- 1 1 definitions were modified to better
align its definitions with NSTC activities; budget data was collected
later in the process when the estimates are more reliable; and crosscut
data was submitted to OMB as part of the normal Agency budget process,
rather than through NSTC Committees.
The NSTC Committees, with the general R&D budget priorities in mind,
developed a list of recommended general strategic focus areas for the
Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Program. On May 28, 1995, I
asked the Agency and Department Heads to give careful consideration to
these recommendations when developing their SBIR Program solicitation
notices.
Federal Laboratory Review
Under NSTC's auspices, a Federal Laboratory Review of the
Department of Energy (DoE), the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA), and the Department of Defense (DoD) was completed
in May 1995. These three laboratory systems account for at least
one-fifth of the entire federal investment in R&D--approximately
$15 billion of an approximate $70 billion total. The core purpose of
this review was to assess the continuing value of these laboratories in
serving vital public needs, including options for change that
would cut costs and improve R&D productivity. Prior to the Federal
Laboratory Review, all three agencies recognized that their laboratory
systems faced downsizing, as missions are more sharply focused and
unnecessary duplication is eliminated. As a result of the Federal
Laboratory Review, the President concluded in late September that the
laboratory systems of the DoE, NASA, and DoD provide essential services
to the Nation in fundamental science, national security, environmental
protection, energy, aerospace, and technologies that contribute to
industrial competitiveness.
State-Federal Technology Partnership Task Force
In January 1995, the Chair of the National Governors' Association
(NGA) and I announced the establishment of a State-Federal Technology
Partnership Task Force. The Task Force's primary objective was to
identify ways to strengthen State-Federal science and technology
partnerships to advance the Nation's goals and, in particular, the economic
benefits of greater cooperation. The Task Force built on the work of
the State-Federal Technology Partnership, a joint effort of the Carnegie
Commission on Science, Technology and Government, the NGA, the National
Conference of State Legislatures, and the American
Society of Mechanical Engineers. The partnership consisted of 20
national leaders, including four governors, state legislators, and chief
executives from business, academia, and non-governmental organizations.
Former Governors Richard Celeste of Ohio and Richard Thornburgh of
Pennsylvania Co-Chaired the initiative.
The Task Force identified a set of overarching and operational
principles essential to the development and flourishing of any
State-Federal partnership. Their report offered four
recommendations, under the following headings:
- Renewing the National Science and Technology System
- Building the role of the States in the National Science and Technology
- System Catalyzing Private Sector Investments in Technology
- Building National Excellence in Manufacturing
The Task Force's final report was issued on September 5, 1995.
An NSTC Working Group, chaired by Mary Good, Department of Commerce's
Under Secretary for Technology, assessed the report and made
recommendations to the NSTC regarding opportunities we can
pursue as part of the renewed national effort. In an effort to
encourage demonstrable State-Federal partnerships, a broad range of
potential outreach activities have been identified.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC)
OSTP, in consultation with members of the NSTC, developed a
proposal to create a standing body of experts to consider bioethical
issues arising from research on human biology and behavior, and the
applications of such research. The result was the
establishment of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC). A
public announcement regarding the establishment of NBAC coincided with
the release of the Human Radiation Experiment Report on October 3,
1995.
The NBAC will be appointed by the President from knowledgeable
non-government experts and community representatives with special
qualifications and competence to deal effectively with bioethical issues
of concern to the participating departments and agencies.
As a first priority, the Commission will direct its attention to
consideration of issues in the management and use of genetic information
and protection of the rights and welfare of research subjects.
Education Technology Initiative
The President announced this major education initiative on October 10,
1995, as a national effort to prepare American students for the 21st
century. This four part initiative includes: 1) making modern computers
and learning devices accessible to every student 2) connecting classrooms
to one another and the outside world 3) including educational software as
an integral part of the curriculum and 4) training teachers to use
effectively education technology. An inherent element of the Education
Technology Initiative is a national public-private partnership to connect
every classroom in America to the information superhighway by the year
2000. Also included are a variety of activities--the Challenge Grants
Program, the Tech Corps, and the American Technology Honor Society. The
Challenge Grant Program is strongly supported by the NSTC Committee on
Education and Training (CET) and has drawn upon the technical expertise
of the CET agencies. Other activities under this initiative build upon
the interagency cooperation established by the NSTC. Additional
Presidential education technology announcements are scheduled for CY 1996.
The NSTC established an Interagency Learning Technology Office
(ILTO) to achieve its strategic vision of quality education through
cross-agency cooperation. A major ILTO task is to, produce a series of
interagency learning technology demonstrations, ensuring the
best federal research and development products are systematically
transitioned to public and commercial uses. The ILTO will also serve as a
focal point for communication with state and local governments, as well
as with industry. The establishment of the ILTO supports the
Administration's effort to reinvent the Federal Government and achieve
greater efficiencies and productivity.
Seismic Networks
On November 14, 1995, key members of Congress received a letter
summarizing the results of a year-long NSTC interagency process to
improve the coordination of Federal seismic research and monitoring
activities. The letter was written to call attention to the
importance of U.S. seismic network programs and their relationship to
test ban negotiations. These programs provide data to the U.S. in the
areas of monitoring of nuclear weapons tests,
geoscience research, and earthquake hazard monitoring. Each application
has different requirements and the Administration examined the
appropriate funding and potential for multiple use of such networks.
The analysis reaffirmed the synergy among seismic network
applications, and that data should be collected and shared to maximize
the benefit to all three areas. Included was a commitment to carry out a
program of global monitoring of nuclear weapons tests in
accordance with the position taken by the U.S. in recent test ban
negotiations, which explicitly included a role for auxiliary seismic
stations.
The letter recommended, starting in FY 1997, funding for the
Global Seismic Network by the agency most directly responsible for a
network, rather than on a centralized basis by the DoD. The importance
of fully funding the DoD's request for primary seismic
arrays for nuclear test monitoring was emphasized in the letter.
NSTC Presidential Review Directives
The NSTC, through the issuance of NSTC Presidential Review Directives
(PRD's), directs member agencies and departments to undertake reviews
and analyses. In May 1995, the NSTC issued two PRD'S, as follows:
- Space Policy Review--The President established an Interagency
Working Group, co-chaired by OSTP and the National Security Council, to
conduct a comprehensive review of national space policy. The
intent of this review is to ensure that written policies reflect the
Administration's civilian, national security, and commercial space
policies. The Interagency Working Group was also tasked with
identifying and recommending changes to related national security
directives containing guidance on space policies and programs. External
advice may be sought from the President's Committee of Advisors on
Science and Technology (PCAST) and other appropriate
representatives of industry, academia, the non-profit sector, as well as
state and local governments. Recommendations are expected by spring 1996.
- Global Positioning System (GPS) Policy Review--The President directed
OSTP and the National Security Council to lead a comprehensive review of
policy issues related to the future management and use of the GPS. GPS
uses a constellation of 24 earth-orbiting satellites that transmit timed
radio signals giving their locations. By combining information from any
four or more GPS satellites, someone on earth can
compute his or her location very precisely, at any time of day, or in
all kinds of weather. While GPS was originally created for national
security purposes, from its inception it has been considered a dual-use
resource, with civilian as well as military applications. Civilian use
of GPS is rising dramatically. A clear statement of national policy is
needed to balance commercial and civil uses of GPS with essential
national security aspects of the system. The Interagency Working Group
reviewed a broad range of GPS-related technology and policy issues
affecting national security, economic policy, and foreign policy, and
made recommendations for a comprehensive national policy for GPS
management and use. (Note: A Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) was
signed March 28, 1996.)
U.S. Antarctic Program Review
In response to a Senate Appropriation Committee request (Report
104-140), NSTC was directed to review the U.S. presence in the Antarctic,
expressing a concern about the ability to continue to fund a U.S.
permanent presence on the continent given severe budget
constraints. An examination of the U.S. scientific program in the
Antarctic was initiated, including an analysis of the roles of the NSF,
DoD, and other Federal Agencies. The study
will also consider the potential for international collaboration and the
importance of maintaining and operating the South Pole Station and two
coastal stations on a year-round basis. Study results will be forwarded
to Congress in April 1996.
Presidential Decision Directive (PDD)
Subsequent to the NSTC laboratory review initiated by NSTC PRD 1,
DoE and DoD, in coordination with the NSC, conducted an examination of
capabilities and functions necessary to conduct an effective
science-based stockpile stewardship program. On the basis
of this review, the President issued an NSTC PDD on September 25, 1995.
This PDD reflected that the continued vitality of all three DoE nuclear
weapons laboratories are essential to the Nation's ability to fulfill the
requirements of stockpile stewardship as we enter into a Comprehensive
Test Ban regime. The PDD directed the DoE to maintain nuclear weapons
responsibilities and capabilities adequate to support the science-based
stockpile stewardship program required to ensure continued confidence in
the safety and reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile in the
absence of nuclear testing.
This PDD directed NASA, DoE and DoD to reform their federal
laboratory systems, by adhering to the following general guidelines and
principles:
- Agencies will review and, as appropriate, rescind internal
management instructions, regulations, and redundant oversight that impede
laboratory performance
- Agencies will clarify and focus mission assignments for their
laboratories, eliminating redundance and restructuring the laboratory
systems, as appropriate and necessary
- In their efforts to achieve greater efficiency and effectiveness in
their laboratory systems, agencies will first seek to achieve all
possible savings through streamlining and improving management. Then, as
necessary, they will reduce or eliminate lower
priority programs, in accordance with guidance from the Office of
Management and Budget and OSTP, based on priorities set by the NSTC and,
as appropriate the National Security Council (NSC)
- Agencies will continue to explore opportunities to coordinate and
integrate laboratory resources and facilities on an interagency and
inter-service basis, eliminating unnecessary duplication and establishing
joint management where appropriate
Attached is a listing and summary description of NSTC PRD's and PDD's
issued to date.
NSTC Committee Sponsored Fora and Colloquia
The NSTC is committed to outreach and collaboration with the
private sector, academia, and the public, to ensure that federal science
and technology policies reflect the full spectrum of the Nation's needs.
A primary means of obtaining input from outside the
Federal Government is through the sponsorship of fora and colloquia
designed to enable interaction among a variety of stakeholders. Major
fora and seminars held in the first 8 months of 1995 include:
- Science in the National Interest Regional Meetings: In
August 1994, Science in the National Interest was released. This policy
document presents the first formal statement by the Administration on
science policy since 1979. Released by Vice President Gore, Science
in the National Interest links scientific research and education to the
broad national goals of health, prosperity, national security,
environmental responsibility, and improved quality of life. As a means
of engaging a broad range of stakeholders--state and local governments,
academia, and private industry--NSTC has participated in a series of
regional meetings. In 1995, regional meetings were held in
Massachusetts, Texas, and Florida.
- Forum on Future Directions in Transportation R&D: The NSTC
Committee on Transportation R&D and the National Academy of Sciences
co-sponsored this forum on March 6 and 7, 1995. The
purpose of the forum was to solicit input, principally from
private industry, to help the Department of Transportation and the NSTC
guide future transportation research. Several hundred people
participated in this public forum. Findings/Proceedings from this meeting
were made publicly available in October 1995.
- Science Leadership Exchange: The Committee on Fundamental
Science (CFS), in conjunction with the Office of Science and
Technology Policy, organized the Science Leadership Exchange in March
1995. This forum provided individuals serving in an
advisory capacity at CIPS member agencies to expand their understanding
of the total Federal support for science. OSTP and eight NSTC agencies
provided insight into their FY 1996 budget.
- The Role of Science and Technology in Promoting National
Security and Global Stability: The NSTC Committee for National
Security and Committee on International Science Engineering and
Technology and Environment, the Council on Foreign Relations,
and the American Association for the Advancement of Science co-hosted a
2-day forum. Individuals from the sponsoring organizations participated,
along with science diplomats and governmental policy makers from the
executive and legislative branches. The purpose of this
March 29-30, 1995, forum was to explore ways of using the science and
technology enterprise to advance the goals of greater national security,
sustainable development, and economic prosperity. The forum enabled open
discussion of our Nation's ability to most
effectively organize and use our science and technology to support
preventive diplomacy, nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction,
military capabilities, economic security, and sustainable development.
The results of these discussions were incorporated into the
National Security Science and Technology Strategy that was released on
September 19, 1995.
- Colloquium on Assessing the Contribution of Fundamental
Science: The NSTC Committee on Fundamental Science sponsored a forum
on May 17, 1995. One purpose of the forum was to enable scientists,
policymakers, research managers, assessment practitioners, and
stakeholders to discuss the new emphasis on programmatic accountability
and its impact on fundamental science. A second purpose was to develop
issues and options for building assessment strategies that will fully
represent the contribution of science to the national well-being. At
this colloquium, diverse members of the public and private scientific
enterprise probed the complexities of the new assessment environment
and explored methods that might be adapted to fundamental science. Key
themes from the background studies, workshop, and colloquium will be
summarized in a series of reports--one published in 1994,
the others to be published in 1996. The NSTC is drafting a paper that
identifies a set of principles and other information for use by Federal
science agencies in designing and testing methods for improved assessment
of fundamental science. This paper is expected to be published in the
spring of calendar year 1996.
- America in the Age of Information: A Forum on Federal
Information and Communications R&D: On July 6-7, 1995, the NSTC
Committee on Information and Communications R&D sponsored this forum as a
follow-on activity to the publication of their
March 1995 Strategic Planning Document. The purpose of the forum was to obtain
community comment on, enhancement to, and refinement of the Plan in
order to address national goals and to be responsive to the needs of the
American workforce and citizenry. White Papers were solicited from
university organizations, professional societies, industrial
organizations, other Federal and State organizations, and concerned
citizens on subjects addressed in this Strategic Implementation Plan.
Authors of selected White Papers presented their papers and participated
in a discussion at the forum.
- Forum on Emerging Infectious Diseases: The NSTC Committee on
International Science, Engineering and Technology Policy (CISET)
sponsored a public forum on emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases
on July 25, 1995. At the forum, the NSTC CISET Working Group
released a report, Emerging and-Re-emerging Infectious Diseases. The
relationship between infectious disease, public health, and national
security was discussed before several hundred participants, including
many members of the press.
- Making it Happen: First in the World in Science and Mathematics
Education: The July 26-27, 1995, forum was designed to elicit
discussion and debate about policy options for producing the finest
scientists and engineers for the future and improving science literacy for
all Americans. This NSTC sponsored national forum brought together a
broad range of stakeholders--over 200 experts from academia, private
industry, consumer groups, and state and Federal government--to identify
the critical issues, discuss the current status of their collective
efforts, and to address the country's short and long-term objectives.
The forum was co-sponsored by the NSTC Committees on Fundamental Science
and Education and Training.
- Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV Symposia:
The Federal Government and USCAR (Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors)
together with suppliers, other businesses and universities, developed a
joint R&D program. The purpose of this
program is to develop commercially-viable technology that, over the long
term, can preserve personal mobility while reducing the environmental
impact of cars and light trucks and the
U.S. dependence on imported petroleum. In February and September 1995,
the Vice President hosted two symposia on technical areas related to the
PNGV project. The February 1995 symposium focused on the subject of
materials, while the September 1995
symposium discussed energy storage. Scientists and engineers working in
these subject matter areas, from the public, private, and university
sectors, were invited to participate.
- Conference on Human Health and Climate Change: The NSTC
co-sponsored, with the Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of
Sciences, a 2-day Conference on Human Health and Climate Change on
September 11-12, 1995. The purpose of the
conference was two-fold: 1) to bring together a diverse group of experts
to address the potential effects of climate change and ozone depletion on
the current and future incidence of disease, heat stress, food and water
supplies and air pollution and 2) to discuss initial
strategies for improving R&D, global health surveillance systems, health
care and disease prevention, medical and public health community
education, international cooperation, and public outreach. Several
hundred people from the public, private, and university communities
participated in the activities.
- High Performance Computing and Communications (HPCC)
Workshops: The Federal HPCC Program provides essential stimulation
and coordination to accelerate progress in crucial areas of computation,
information, and communications. This program accelerates
deployment of easy-to-use information technology and encourages the
information revolution. During CY 1995 the NSTC Committee on Information
and Communication sponsored several HPCC-related workshops, briefings
and conferences. For example, in January 1995, the Second Pasadena
Workshop on System Software and Tools for High Performance Computing
Environment was held. Sponsored by the Institute of Electrical and
Electronic Engineers and the Association for Computer
Machinery, Federal Strategies and Programs in the Age of Information
Workshop: The SUPERCOMPUTING '95 Conference was held in San Diego,
California on December 3-8, 1995. The NSTC Committee on Information and
Communications (CIC) sponsored a workshop at the conference, addressing
issues associated with the future of federally funded supercomputing
research. Agency plans for the High Performance Computing and
Communications (HPCC) program were discussed, including
highlights of the current HPCC program and its accomplishments.
Participants discussed the concept of high performance computing
research centers and networks. In addition, the CIC Forum Program
Committee led a discussion-of the six strategic focus areas of the CIC's
Strategic Implementation Plan.
NSTC Reports
In an effort to highlight the federal government's investment in
S&T to the American public, the following reports were published. The
NSTC has adopted the policy of providing Internet World Wide Web access
to its reports.
- NSTC Strategic Plans: In March 1995, each of the nine NSTC
committees--Fundamental Science; Health, Safety, and Food; Environment
and Natural Resources;
Information and Communications; National Security; Civilian Industrial
Technology; Transportation; Education and Training; and International
Science, Engineering and Technology--published strategic planning
documents that articulate the goals and objectives of
their specific science and technology areas. These plans identified the
major goals of each Committee, the relevant policy issues and questions
confronting the Committee and the scientific/technological goals and
research priorities necessary to achieve the goals. This
strategic planning activity required the agencies to review major
science and technology initiatives in terms of appropriate agency roles,
milestones, performance measures, resources, private sector input and
international issues.
- 1995 Biennial National Critical Technologies Report: The
Office of Science and Technology Policy's March 1995 National Critical
Technologies Report addresses the state of
development of 27 critical technologies and the U.S. competitive
position relative to Europe and Japan. The principal areas covered by
the report are energy, environmental quality,
information and communication, living systems, manufacturing, materials
and transportation. The report notes that the U.S. is at parity with, or
ahead of, Europe and Japan for all 27
areas. Nevertheless, Japan is outpacing the U.S. in 10 areas and Europe
is outpacing the U.S. in four areas. NSTC and PCAST members were
integral in developing the report.
- Preparing for the Future Through Science and Technology, An
Agenda for Environmental and Natural Resources Research was published in
March 1995. This multidisciplinary strategy provides the scientific and
technical information needed for national
and international policy formulation and to assure the most efficient
use of scarce research and development resources. The strategy was
developed by NSTC, with assistance from stakeholders from academia,
industry, and state and local governments.
- Bridge to a Sustainable Future: Bridge to a Sustainable
Future was published in April 1995, as a follow-on to Technology for
a Sustainable Future. This national environmental technology
strategy focuses on five themes--Performance, Flexibility, and
Accountability; Innovation for Environmental Results;
Commercialization; Sustainable Communities; and Learning and Working
Together. The report also presents findings, goals and initiatives that
collectively articulate a technological path that will lead us to
sustainable development. In reaction to these environmental technology
statements, Molten Metal Technology, Inc. (MMT) and the World Resources
Institute co-sponsored an event on July 21, 1995, at MMT's R&D Recycling
Facility in Fall River, Massachusetts. The
purpose of this gathering was to provide a small number of concerned and
committed leaders from industry, academia, nongovernmental organizations
(NGO's) and federal, state and local Government with the opportunity to
participate in informal, off-the-record discussions.
The 25 participants explored novel approaches to achieving sustainable
development, through the use of environmental technologies.
- High Performance Computing and Communications (HPCC) FY 1996
Implementation Plan: On May 14, 1995, the National Coordination Office
for HPCC published their FY 1996 implementation plan for the HPCC
program. The plan, formulated by the multi-agency HPCC, implements the
overall objectives embodied in the FY 1996
HPCC annual report titled High Performance Computing and
Communications: Foundation for America's Information Future that
accompanied the President's budget. This HPCC
annual report describes HPCC program accomplishments and program plans for
FY 1996. The HPCC continues to be a driving force for progress in
computing, communications, and information technology. There continues
to be extensive use of high performance communications for information
access, research at the frontiers of science and commercial endeavors.
The biomedical and health care arenas have significantly benefitted from
HPCC initiatives. The National Institutes of Health, in collaboration
with the National Science Foundation, provided initial funding to
academic medical centers, community hospitals, and other health care
organizations to connect to the Internet. Special emphasis was given to
linking medical libraries with health care delivery organizations and
database servers in support of timely and accurate clinical decision
making. The overall goal is to provide Internet connectivity to the top
3,000 health care institutions in the U.S.
- Inventions Needed for Partnership for a New Generation of
Vehicles (PNGV) was published, in the spring 1995, to highlight the
research areas requiring focus and identify
federal funding sources for this research. Guidance was provided to the
intended audience--the private and university sectors--on obtaining this
funding.
- Infectious Disease--A Global Health Threat: An NSTC
interagency working group was convened in December 1994, to consider the
global threat of emerging and re-emerging
infectious diseases. This working group included representatives from
more than 17 different government agencies and departments. They
reviewed the U.S. role in detection, reporting,
and response to outbreaks of new and re-emerging infectious diseases and
made a number of recommendations in a report that was released in July
1995. The report noted the extraordinary resiliency of infectious
microbes and that the sharp increase in the incidence of
many infectious diseases is complex and not fully understood. At the
same time, the working group unequivocally stated that the costs of
infectious diseases are staggering, while
the cost-effectiveness of disease prevention has been repeatedly
demonstrated. The report cited the need for U.S. leadership in order to
establish international coordination of infectious
disease prevention efforts and build a global infectious diseases network.
- Setting a New Course for U.S. Coastal Ocean Science: This
final report of the Subcommittee on U.S. Coastal Ocean Science of the
Committee on Environment and Natural
Resources (CENR) was prepared in July 1995. The report makes
recommendations for the future coordination of Federal activity in
coastal ocean science. The report inventories Federal coastal ocean
science efforts for 1991-1993 and outlines a framework for improving
predictive capabilities for coastal ocean systems that link
terrestrial and marine physical processes, biogeochemical cycles, and the
interactions of living resources.
- Biotechnology for the 21st Century: New Horizons: Dated July
1995, this report highlights ongoing Federal research efforts in
biotechnology and identifies new and promising areas where there may be
gaps in Federal support. The report is intended for
internal planning purposes within the Federal Government and as a
mechanism for conveying to the science and technology community the types
of research and research priorities under consideration by Federal agencies.
- Goals for a National Partnership in Aeronautics Research and
Technology: Publicly released by the Clinton Administration in
September 1995, this report was prepared by an NSTC interagency working
group in cooperation with industry and academia. It
presents the Administration's vision and goals for future Federal
investments in aeronautics and aviation research and technology. The
research agenda outlined in this report is meant
to achieve three fundamental goals: maintaining the superiority of U.S.
aircraft and engines; improving the safety, efficiency, and cost
effectiveness of the global air transportation
system; and ensuring the long-term environmental compatibility of the
aviation system.
- National Security Science and Technology Strategy: The NSTC
developed the Nation's first national security S&T strategy document to
describe how U.S. investments and international cooperation in S&T
support U.S. national security objectives. This report
offers a policy context for a rigorous defense of Clinton
Administration initiatives, including the Cooperative Threat Reduction
(Nunn-Lugar) Program, the Advanced Technology
Program, and economic development programs aimed at mitigating or
addressing the problems of endemic poverty, overpopulation, food
scarcity, infectious diseases and environmental degradation. Published in
September 1995, this report provides a clear
juxtaposition between the Administration's and the Congressional
majority's approaches to America's role in the world. It also focuses
on the importance of investments in support of
military superiority, verifiable arms control, sustainable development
abroad, and economic performance at home.
- A National R&D Strategy for Toxic Substances and Hazardous and
Solid Waste: A strategy prepared by the Committee on Environment and
Natural Resources' Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Solid Waste
Subcommittee and published in September 1995.
The strategy, presented within a risk assessment and risk management
framework, identifies research needs for evaluation and managing risks
associated with toxic substances and solid wastes.
- Interagency Federal Laboratory Review Final Report:
Released in September 1995, the findings of an interagency review of the
three largest Federal laboratory systems--DoE,
DoD, and NASA--evaluates options for change with the intent of cutting
costs, while improving research and development productivity.
- Strategy for National Earthquake Loss Reduction: Prepared by
the NSTC National Earthquake Strategy Working Group and issued in October
1995, this report recommends a prudent National S&T strategy for reducing
loss of life, casualties, property losses, and social and economic
disruptions from future earthquakes.
- Our Changing Planet: The FY 1996 U.S. Global Change Research
Program: Published in October 1995, by the Committee on
Environment and Natural Resources' Subcommittee on Global Change
Research. The report serves as a supplement to the
President's FY 1996 budget. The report updates the planning for the
U.S. Global Change Research Program, describes the program's areas of
activity, tabulates agency programs on global environmental change, and
includes a set of highlights describing a number of important scientific
advances.
- Forum on Future Directions in Transportation R&D: This
report consists of conference proceedings from the March 6-7, 1995, forum
co-sponsored by the Transportation Research Board and the NSTC.
Published in October 1995, this report addresses
development of an effective Federal transportation R&D plan, with input
solicited from industry leaders, state and local government officials,
as well as representatives of environmental and other public interest
groups.
- Construction and Building: Federal Research and Development in
Support of the U.S. Construction Industry: The construction and building
collaboration between Federal agencies and the U.S. construction
industry is intended to develop improved construction
techniques that enhance industry's competitive performance, raise the
life-cycle performance of buildings, and protect public safety and the
environment. Quantitative goals have been
established for accomplishment by 2003, including 50 percent reduction
in operation, maintenance, and energy costs; 50 percent fewer accidents
and deaths associated with
construction and occupancy; and 50 percent less waste and pollution.
In October 1995, Construction and Building: Federal Research and
Development in Support of the U.S.
Construction Industry was released by the NSTC Committee on Civilian
Industrial Technology, Subcommittee on Construction and Building. The
report outlines the Federal strategy research and development and
deployment in support of the industries of
construction. Examples of important proposed deployment projects that
can act as showcases for technology developments are described in the report.
- Interagency Report on Orbital Debris: Developed by an
Interagency Working Group co-chaired by NSTC Committee on Transportation
R&D and the National Security
Council, and drawing on the National Research Council's orbital debris
technical assessment study sponsored by NASA, this November 1995, report
notes NASA and DoD actions to
date and offers five recommendations for ensuring the safety of human
space flight, protecting the economic investment made by U.S. industry in
space, protecting international space assets, and the long-term
protection of the space environment.
- Building a Scientific Basis to Ensure the Vitality and
Productivity of U.S. Ecosystems: Prepared by the NSTC Committee on
Environment and Natural Resources' (CENR's) Ecosystem Working Group,
this December 1995, report addresses an effective
plan for sustaining ecosystems that would integrate CENR ecosystem
research and development priorities across all relevant CENR Subcommittees.
Attached is a bibliography of all NSTC documents published to date.
First/Second Quarters CY 1996 Activities
During the first/second quarters of CY 1996, the NSTC will
continue and complete several ongoing activities, as well as initiate new
activities, including:
- Completion of the FY 1997 and initiation of the FY 1998 budget
review processes
- Completion of the interagency space policy system review directed by
NSTC PRD 2.
- Publication of 1995 Federal Research and Development Program in
Materials Science and Technology report
- Issuance of revised PNGV program plan and sponsorship of PNGV Technical
Symposium
- Issuance of Meeting the Challenge: A Research Agenda for America's
Health, Safety and Food Report
- Release of the Interagency Assessment of Potential Health Risks
Associated with Oxygenated Gasoline report
President's Committee of Advisors
for Science and Technology (PCAST) Activities
President Clinton established the PCAST at the same time that he
established the NSTC. The PCAST serves as the highest level private
sector advisory group for the President and for the NSTC on science and
technology issues, providing input on issues of
national importance. This formal link between the PCAST and the NSTC
ensures that national needs remain an overarching guide for the NSTC.
The PCAST issued the following four reports to the President in
FY 1995, in addition to providing informal advice to the President and
NSTC; writing Op-Ed's and letters; and
working with Congress to help its members understand the importance of
the S&T enterprise to the Nation's security and economic growth:
- Report of the PCAST Panel on U.S.-Russian Cooperation to Protect,
Control, and Account for Weapons-Useable Nuclear Materials released in
May 1995. This report was presented to the President, Vice President,
White House Chief of Staff, National
Security Adviser and his Deputy, Vice President's National Security
Adviser and other National Security Council (NSC) and OSTP staff.
Subsequent briefings were provided to the Secretary of Defense, the
Undersecretary of Energy, and the interagency Standing Committee on
Non-Proliferation, among others. After the White
House briefing, the President immediately directed the NSC to act on
all of the PCAST recommendations and a work plan was forwarded to the
President within
days. The briefing served as a catalyst for drafting, on the same day
as the briefing, proposed language for a summit statement on expanding
fissile materials cooperation.
After some negotiation, President Clinton and President Yeltsin issued
a statement from the summit calling for accelerated and expanded
cooperation to secure and
account for nuclear materials, and directing the Gore-Chernomyrdin
Commission to prepare a joint report on additional steps that should be
taken. Working closely with
OSTP staff, the NSC prepared a NSC Presidential Decision Directive
highlighting the urgency and importance of this problem, and directing
agencies to implement the principal recommendations of the PCAST report.
- The U. S. Program of Fusion Energy Research and Development, July
1995, report of the PCAST Fusion Review Panel recommends a strategy for
restructuring the U.S. fusion program, at a substantially reduced level
of funding. The PCAST concluded
that U.S. funding for R&D on fusion energy is a key long term
investment in the energy future of this country and the world, as well
as critical for sustaining research
in plasma science. The report emphasizes the importance of fusion as an
attractive, possibly essential, new energy source for our Nation in the
middle of the next century and beyond. The large scale of fusion
experimental technology, the long time to
commercialization, and recent extraordinary achievements argue for
continued strong Federal support within the DoE. Further, the report
indicates that international
collaboration is necessary for demonstrating practical fusion energy.
The panel recommended that the U.S. invest in magnetic fusion energy
research at $320 million per year, through the next decade. The PCAST
concluded that if the budget is dramatically reduced below $320 million
per year, the program would lose essential
elements and progress toward the fusion goal would be halted. Thus, if
the U.S. is to sustain its commitment to plasma science and fusion
technology, federal support at the PCAST recommended level would be required.
- Science and Technology Principles was forwarded to the President
and senior Congressional members on September 25, 1995. The Principles
were developed in the context of the current budget debate to aid the
Administration and Congress in evaluating FY 1997 budget options,
consistent with the Administration's policy statements Science in the
National Interest (August 1994) and Technology for
America's Future Growth (February 1993).
- Report to the President on Academic Health Centers, November 8,
1995. The PCAST. recommended that while public and private elements of
the health care system need to be carefully examined and restructured to
enhance medical efficacy and cost effectiveness, it is essential that the
crucial public benefits uniquely contributed by
academic health centers be recognized and that their continued strength
remain a priority.
On March 28, 1995, the PCAST also issued a budget related
statement reflecting their belief that in "the debate over national
spending priorities, we must take time to assess
carefully the impact of proposed cuts on our Nation's ability to
maintain world-class science and technology. " This statement recognizes
the need to maintain a robust research and
development portfolio--an investment "essential to our Nation's long
term prosperity and security."
Attachments: a/s
Summary of NSTC Presidential Review and Decision Directives
(as of December 1995)
Presidential Review Directives:
#1. Interagency Review of Federal Laboratories (May 5, 1994):
Interagency review of Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Energy
(DoE) and National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA)--the three largest laboratory systems to
evaluate and develop recommendations for ways to improve their efficiency
and effectiveness. The NSTC's
review was intended to provide guidance, building upon, and integrating
the individual agency reviews.
#2. Interagency Space Policy Review (May 15, 1995): Comprehensive
review of national space policy to identify and recommend changes,
ensuring written policies reflect the
Administration's civilian, national security, and commercial space
policy. Identified and recommended changes to related national security
directives containing guidance on space policies and programs.
#3. Interagency Global Positioning System Policy Review (May 18,
1995): Review Global Positioning System (GPS) policy issues and
recommended national policy on the future
management and use of GPS. Considered national security, economic
policy and foreign policy issues.
Summary of NSTC Presidential Review and
Decision Directives (Cont'd)
Presidential Decision Directives:
#1. Establishment of Presidential Review and Decision Series/NSTC
(January 25, 1994): Established NSTC PRD's and PDD's to inform Federal
departments and agencies of Presidential directives.
#2. Convergence of U.S.-Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental
Satellite Systems (May 5, 1994): Integrated Department of Commerce
(DoC) and DoD's polar-orbiting
environmental satellite systems to reduce the cost of acquisition and
operation. DOD, NASA and DoC were directed to create an Integrated
Program Office and form a convergence
Executive Committee to ensure that both civil and national security
requirements are satisfied; to coordinate program plans, budgets and
policies; and to ensure that agency funding commitments are equitable and
sustained.
#3. Landsat Remote Sensing Strategy (May 5, 1994): Provided for
continuation of the Landsat 7 program, assuring continuity of
Landsat-type and quality of data and reducing the risk of a data gap.
#4. National Space Transportation Policy (August 5, 1994):
Established national policy, guidelines, and implementing actions for the
conduct of national space transportation
programs to sustain and revitalize U.S. space transportation
capabilities. Recognized the criticality of space program to achieving
national security, scientific, technical, commercial
and foreign policy goals. Recognized that assuring reliable and
affordable access to space through U.S. space transportation capabilities
is a fundamental goal of the U.S. space
program. Granted DoD the lead agency responsibility for improvement and
evolution of the current expendable launch vehicle fleet. NASA delegated
responsibility for improving the
space shuttle system, focusing on reliability, safety and
cost-effectiveness. Assigned the Department of Transportation and DOC
responsibility for private sector and state/local government
arrangements. Directed NASA and DoD to develop a Memorandum of
Agreement to consolidate future expendable launch service requirements.
#5. Guidelines for Federal Laboratory Reform (September 24, 1995):
Concluded that the DoD, NASA and DoE Federal laboratories provide
essential services to the Nation in
fundamental science, national security, environmental protection and
cleanup, and industrial competitiveness. Stated that all three DoE
nuclear weapons labs are essential; directed DoE
to maintain nuclear weapons responsibilities and capabilities adequate
to support the science-based stockpile stewardship program required to
ensure continued confidence in the safety
and reliability of the nuclear-weapons stockpile in the absence of
nuclear testing. Directed the three agencies to: 1) review and, as
appropriate, rescind internal management
instructions and oversight that impede laboratory performance, 2)
clarify and focus the mission assignments of their laboratories, 3)
achieve all possible budget savings through
streamlining and management improvements before productive R&D programs are
sacrificed.
NSTC - Related Publications
President and First Lady | Vice President and Mrs. Gore Record of Progress | The Briefing Room Gateway to Government | Contacting the White House White House for Kids | White House History White House Tours | Help | Text Only Privacy Statement | |