A Matrix of Capital Budgeting

This is historical material, "frozen in time."
The web site is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages will not work.

A Matrix of Capital Budgeting Problems and Options Staff Paper Prepared for the President's Commission to Study Capital Budgeting

Categories of Investment

	Problem	Federal Assets (defense & nondefense)		Infrastructure (transportation)		Other Investment (tangible and intangible)
1	There is little long-term planning for capital in life-cycle context outside of the Department of Defense.	o	Require 10-year capital plan linked to budget.	o	Require 10-year planning by grant recipients.	o	Favor grant recipients that do long-term pl anning.
		o	Set capital plan in context of agency GPRA plans.	o	Reward jurisdictions doing high quality planning.		Favor grant recipients that do long-term pl anning.
		o	Enforce rules in Capital Programming Guide.
		o	Plan for full asset life-cycle.
2	No one is fully responsible for capital planning.	o	Hold agency heads primarily responsible.	o	Improved accountability needed here too?	o	Improved accountability needed here too?
3	Information about physical, financial characteristics of assets is inadequate.	o	Require agency system for property, financial accountability.	o	Require inventory of use and condition.
4	Accounting standards do not include current cost or imputed interest.	o	Ask FASAB to consider current cost, imputed interest.
5	Pork barrel projects are often chosen over projects with higher returns.	o	Require benefit/cost studies to be submitted, published on internet.	o	Require grantees to publish benefit-cost by project.	o	Require grantees to publish benefit-cost by program. Summarize them in Analytical Perspectives.
5		o	Ask CBO, GAO to provide timely studies to Congress.	o	Summarize them in Analytical Perspectives.	o
6	Dedicated revenues are not fully used to finance designated investment.			o	Consider a separate cap for infrastructure funded by earmarked revenues.
7	There are no goals or targets for any category of investment.			o	Consider alternative ways to set investment targets.	o	Consider alternative ways to set investment targets.
8	Funding is not always assured to complete projects efficiently.	o	Require regular or advance appropriations for full cost of usable segments.	o	Use long-range plans to manage funding.	o	Use long-range plans to manage funding.
9	Projects often take more than one year to complete.	o	Require multiyear appropriations for projects that will take years to complete.
10	Spikes in necessary funding sometimes deter justified investment.	o	Aggregate capital in CAFs; cover remaining spikes w/central funding if justified.	o	Use long-range plans to manage funding.
11	Programs are not charged uniformly and fully for their use of capital.	o	CAFs would charge all uniformly for capital use.
12	Programs are not charged uniformly for their use of labor, support services.	o	Charge for retiree benefits, and support services.
13	Inappropriate choices are made to lease vs. buy.	o	Improve incentives to make economic choices.
14	Cost over-runs, delays, and poor quality plague many acquisitions.	o	Use performance-based management system to acquire assets.
15	Government often buys hi-tech, custom projects that come a cropper.	o	Require off-the-shelf or prototype; Raines rules.
16	Capital is often poorly maintained.	o	Plan maintenance and monitor actual.	o	Require grantees to meet maintenance criteria.
16	Capital is often poorly maintained.	o	Consider advance funding.	o	Require grantees to meet maintenance criteria.
17	Capital is often poorly utilized.	o	Charge for cost of capital; share revenue from property disposition.

President's Commission to Study Capital Budgeting

Help

Site Map

Graphic Version

T H E W H I T E H O U S E