MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: Estate, Gift, and Generation-skipping Transfer Taxes
                              THE WHITE HOUSE

                       Office of the Press Secretary

_
For Immediate Release                            August 31, 2000


TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:


     I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 8, legislation to
phase out Federal estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer taxes over
a 10-year period.  While I support and would sign targeted and fiscally
responsible legislation that provides estate tax relief for small
businesses, family farms, and principal residences along the lines proposed
by House and Senate Democrats, this bill is fiscally irresponsible and
provides a very expensive tax break for the best-off Americans while doing
nothing for the vast majority of working families.  Starting in 2010, H.R.
8 would drain more than $50 billion annually to benefit only tens of
thousands of families, taking resources that could have been used to
strengthen Social Security and Medicare for tens of millions of families.

     This repeal of the estate tax is the latest part in a tax plan that
would cost over $2 trillion, spending projected surpluses that may never
materialize and returning America to deficits.  This would reverse the
fiscal discipline that has helped make the American economy the strongest
it has been in generations and would leave no resources to strengthen
Social Security or Medicare, provide a voluntary Medicare prescription drug
benefit, invest in key priorities like education, or pay off the debt held
by the public by 2012.  This tax plan would threaten our continued economic
expansion by raising interest rates and choking off investment.

     We should cut taxes this year, but they should be the right tax cuts,
targeted to working families to help our economy grow -- not tax breaks
that will help only the wealthiest few while putting our prosperity at
risk.  Our tax cuts will help send our children to college, help families
with members who need long-term care, help pay for child care, and help
fund desperately needed school construction.  Overall, my tax program will
provide substantially more benefits to middle-income American families than
the tax cuts passed by the congressional tax-writing committees this year,
at less than half the cost.

     H.R. 8, in particular, suffers from several problems.  The true cost
of the bill is masked by the backloading of the tax cut.  H.R. 8 would
explode in cost from about $100 billion from 2001-2010 to about $750
billion from 2011-2020, just when the baby boom generation begins to retire
and Social Security and Medicare come under strain.

     Repeal would also be unwise because estate and gift taxes play an
important role in the overall fairness and progressivity of our tax system.
These taxes ensure that the portion of income that is not taxed during life
(such as unrealized capital gains) is taxed at death.  Estate tax repeal
would benefit only about 2 per-cent of decedents, providing an average tax
cut of $800,000 to only 54,000 families in 2010.  More than half of the
benefits of repeal would go to one-tenth of one percent of families, just
3,000 families annually, with an average tax cut of $7 million.
Furthermore, research suggests that repeal of the estate and gift taxes is
likely to reduce charitable giving by as much as $6 billion per year.

     In 1997, I signed legislation that reduced the estate tax for small
businesses and family farms, but I believe that the estate tax is still
burdensome to some family farms and small businesses.  However, only a tiny
fraction of the tax relief provided under H.R. 8 benefits these important
sectors of our economy, and much of that relief would not be realized for a
decade.  In contrast, House and Senate Democrats have proposed alternatives
that would provide significant, immediate tax relief to family-owned
businesses and farms in a manner that is much more fiscally responsible
than outright repeal.  For example, the Senate Democratic alternative would
take about two-thirds of families off the estate tax entirely, and could
eliminate estate taxes for almost all small businesses and family farms.
In contrast to H.R. 8 -- which waits until 2010 to repeal the estate tax --
most of the relief in the Democratic alternatives is offered immediately.

     By providing more targeted and less costly relief, we preserve the
resources necessary to provide a Medicare prescription drug benefit, extend
the life of Social Security and Medicare, and pay down the debt by 2012.
Maintaining fiscal discipline also would continue to provide the best kind
of tax relief to all Americans, not just the wealthiest few, by reducing
interest rates on home mortgages, student loans, and other essential
investments.

     This surplus comes from the hard work and ingenuity of the American
people.  We owe it to them -- and to their children -- to make the best use
of it.  This bill, in combination with the tax bills already passed and
planned for next year, would squander the surplus -- without providing the
immediate estate tax relief that family farms, small businesses, and other
estates could receive under the fiscally responsible alternatives rejected
by the Congress.  For that reason, I must veto this bill.

     Since the adjournment of the Congress has prevented my return of H.R.
8 within the meaning of Article I, section 7, clause 2 of the Constitution,
my withholding of approval from the bill precludes its becoming law.  The
Pocket Veto Case, 279 U.S. 655 (1929).  In addition to withholding my
signature and thereby invoking my constitutional power to "pocket veto"
bills during an adjournment of the Congress, to avoid litigation, I am also
sending H.R. 8 to the House of Representatives with my objections, to leave
no possible doubt that I have vetoed the measure.

     I continue to welcome the opportunity to work with the Congress on a
bipartisan basis on tax legislation that is targeted, fiscally responsible,
and geared towards continuing the economic strength we all have worked so
hard to achieve.




                                   WILLIAM J. CLINTON




THE WHITE HOUSE,
    AUGUST 31, 2000.




                                 # # #


President and First Lady | Vice President and Mrs. Gore
Record of Progress | The Briefing Room
Gateway to Government | Contacting the White House | White House for Kids
White House History | White House Tours | Help
Privacy Statement

Help

Site Map

Graphic Version

T H E   W H I T E   H O U S E