| || |
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release July 31, 2000
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
TO THE COMMUNITY OF THE
BARKSDALE SPECIAL PROGRAMS CENTER
David Barksdale Senior Center
12:00 P.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Let's give her another hand. Didn't she do a great
job? (Applause.) Paul Herrera, thank you, and the Barksdale Senior Golden
Age Club, for welcoming me here. I'm delighted to be here. And thank all
of you for coming out.
I want to thank Bill Nelson, your Insurance Commissioner, for joining
me here and for the work he's done to protect Florida seniors from
insurance fraud, and also the work he's done to help enroll children in the
Children's Health Insurance Program. I thank him for that. (Applause.)
Mayor Grecco, it's good to be back in your great city. I love it
here. I'd also like to acknowledge the presence in the audience of your
former Lt. Governor, now our Special Envoy to Latin America, Buddy MacKay.
Thank you for being here. (Applause.)
This center was founded in 1942. It was then a place where Army and
Air Force personnel could enjoy it during off-duty hours. While the uses
of the Barksdale Center have changed over the years, the purpose hasn't; it
still serves those who served our nation, in uniform and in so many other
ways. As Paul Herrera has said, the Barksdale Center has become a second
home for many of Tampa's seniors and disabled citizens, a place to take
music classes, to learn the two-step -- maybe I'm not too old to learn that
-- to get a nutritious meal; and a bedrock of security, a place you can all
rely on in good times and bad. I appreciate the work that is done here.
For our nation, these are good times, remarkably good times, virtually
without precedent in the history of America. Like the rest of America,
Florida is on the move. When I came to Tampa as a candidate in 1992, the
unemployment rate was over 7 percent; today it's 2.7 percent. The nation
has created over 22 million jobs, with the lowest unemployment rate in 30
years, the longest economic expansion in history, with record deficits
turned into record surpluses.
The question before the American people, as the Congress deliberates
and as the voters deliberate, is what are we going to do with this magic
moment of prosperity? What is the best use of it? Will we think about
short-term gains or will we think about what we should do for our country
over the long run for people of all ages, all races and all backgrounds,
and all income groups. I believe one of the most important things we can
do with our prosperity is to strengthen Medicare by adding a prescription
drug benefit. (Applause.)
Thirty-five years ago when President Johnson signed Medicare into law,
he created a cornerstone upon which generations of Americans could safely
rest. Since then, Medicare has been a remarkable success and a solid
guarantee. Before Medicare, more than half of our seniors had no health
care coverage at all. Serious illness often wiped away in an instant all
the savings families had put away over a lifetime of hard work.
Today, nearly every senior has the security of basic health coverage.
Poverty among elderly has fallen dramatically as a result. And Americans
over 65 have the highest life expectancy of all the world's seniors. Any
American who lives to be 65 today has a life expectancy in excess of 82
years. People over 80 are the fastest growing group of people in America
in percentage terms. I hope to be one of them one of these days.
(Laughter.) Yet, for all its success, as Bill Nelson made clear, Medicare
simply has not kept pace with the growing miracles of modern medicine.
The Medicare law was created at a time when patients' lives were more
often saved by a surgeon's scalpel than by pharmaceuticals, when many of
the lifesaving drugs we now take for granted did not even exist, indeed
were not even thought of.
Prescription drugs today can accomplish what once was done through
expensive surgery and no one -- if we were creating the Medicare program
today, starting from scratch, it would not even occur to anyone to create a
Medicare program without a prescription drug benefit.
Adding a voluntary prescription drug benefit is the right thing to do,
but it's also the smart thing to do. Today, fully half of Medicare
beneficiaries don't have prescription drug coverage for part or all of the
year. And the cost of prescription drugs is taking too big a bite out of
the fixed incomes of too many seniors and people with disabilities. You
heard that today in the remarks that were made before I came up here, in
ways more eloquent than I could possibly express.
Sylvia's story is not unique to her. I'll bet it's repeated among a
lot of you in this audience, and I can promise you all across America,
there are millions and millions and millions just like her. Too many
people literally are forced to choose on a weekly basis between filling
their prescriptions and filling their grocery carts.
A Family USA report released today shows that the cost of prescription
drugs is continuing to increase. According to this report, older Americans
now pay an average of more than $1,200 a year for prescription drugs, up
from $559 in 1992. The amount is projected to increase to more than --
listen to this -- $2,800 over the next decade. Here in Florida, hundreds
of thousands of seniors like the benefits of dependable prescription drug
coverage. Thousands of others try to get coverage through private Medigap
insurance plans and managed care. Some have succeeded only to be dropped
later by their private care plans and left with nothing more than an empty
In fact, just this year, nearly a million Medicare beneficiaries
around America, more than 85,000 in Florida alone, were dropped by their
managed care plans. For most seniors, that leaves only one alternative to
drug coverage -- they can buy into a private Medigap program, which can
cost hundreds of dollars a month for a benefit with a $250 deductible and
no protections against catastrophic drug costs.
Now, most of us tend to think of Medicare beneficiaries as seniors,
but in fact, 5 million of them are people with disabilities under the age
of 65. A quarter million of them live right here in Florida, too. As
difficult as it is for seniors to get affordable and dependable
prescription drugs, it's an even greater challenge for Americans with
Today I'm releasing another report that documents how Medicare
beneficiaries with disabilities are in poor health, require more
prescriptions, and are less likely to have private prescription drug
coverage. The report also shows that people with disabilities purchased 40
percent more drugs than the typical Medicare beneficiary. And like seniors
who lack drug coverage, they, too, pay more for the drugs they do get.
On average, Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities who lack coverage
spend 50 percent more out of pocket for 50 percent fewer prescriptions than
those who have coverage. Let me say that again. People without coverage
spend 50 percent more out of pocket for 50 percent fewer prescriptions than
those who have coverage. These drugs aren't only lifesaving; they can help
people with disabilities return to work and make even greater contributions
to their communities -- people like Patricia Fell, over here to my right
who came up with me, on the stage, from Clearwater. She suffers every day
from a very painful hip condition. She has been a foster mother -- listen
to this -- to 87 children. (Applause.) And her daughter is here with us
today and we welcome her.
She uses her disability check to pay her $4,300 annual prescription
drug bill. She would work full-time, but if she did, she'd lose her
disability check. That's what pays for the prescription drugs she
desperately needs. She told me that this is continuing to be an agonizing
choice for her.
Now, people like her, who have done their part for our country and
done way more than most people have to help children in need, shouldn't
have to make a choice between health and work. A Medicare drug benefit
would give Pat the chance to be as healthy, active and productive as she
could possibly be.
That's why I have proposed a plan to provide a Medicare prescription
drug benefit that is voluntary and accessible to all seniors and all
Americans with disabilities; a plan that ensures that all older Americans
and other eligible Americans with disabilities, no matter where they live
or how sick they are, will pay the same affordable $25 a month premium; a
plan that uses price competition, not price controls, to give seniors and
people with disabilities the best price as possible; a plan that would
cover catastrophic drug costs; a plan that provides beneficiaries the
prescriptions they need at the pharmacies they trust; a plan that is part
of an overall effort to strengthen and modernize Medicare and lengthen its
life so that we will not have to ask our children to shoulder the burden of
the baby boom generation when we retire.
Now, in response, the Republican majority in Congress has passed a
private insurance plan that many seniors and people with disabilities
simply will not be able to afford. You see that already with the Medigap
plan. It won't offer affordable and accessible coverage to all seniors.
It relies on a trickle-down scheme that provides a subsidy for insurers,
but not a single dollar for middle class seniors and people with
disabilities. And let me say this: over half the seniors and people with
disabilities who lack affordable insurance coverage today have incomes
above 150 percent of the poverty line, which is about $12,600 for an
individual senior, about $16,600 for a couple.
Now, I'm President, I'm not supposed to say it's a bunch of baloney,
like Sylvia did. (Laughter.) But you might be surprised to know who
agrees with her -- the insurance companies, themselves. Even the insurance
companies concede that a Medigap insurance model will not work for
prescription drug coverage. This is very, very important.
Here's what one insurance company had to say -- and I quote --
"Private, stand-alone prescription drug coverage will not work. Such
coverage would constitute an empty promise to Medicare beneficiaries."
Insurance companies are refusing to participate in such a program. The
state of Nevada tried to implement a private insurance model quite similar
to the Republican plan which passed through Congress. They could not find
one single qualified insurance company even willing to offer the coverage,
because they knew it couldn't be done at an affordable rate and they didn't
want to be accused of perpetrating a fraud on the seniors in the state.
It's clear that this plan that passed with the votes of the Republican
majority is basically designed for the pharmaceutical companies who make
the drugs, not the seniors who take them. Now, why would they do that?
Because they believe that if we have a Medicare program, we will be able to
buy these pharmaceuticals in bulk and get you a better price, and because
charging higher prices for Americans recovers all the research costs of
these drugs and that enables them to sell the drugs for a profit at much
lower prices in other countries -- which is why I'm sure you've seen all
these stories about people taking buses to Canada to buy their drugs.
Unfortunately, Florida is nowhere near North Dakota, so that's not an
option for most of you. But that's what's going on here. And it's
unbelievable to me.
What are we going to do with our prosperity? This week -- and you may
hear if you turn on the television, the Republicans when they meet in
Philadelphia in convention talking about all their tax cut bills and how
wonderful they'd be for you. But what they don't say is that if you take
all their tax cut proposals in total, it spends the entire projected
surplus of the country for the next 10 years. Congressman Davis just came
in, your Congressman -- he was nodding his head. So I want to acknowledge
you. Thank you for being here, sir.
They spent -- you know, they're trying to put the heat on him.
They're trying to say, well, people in Tampa ought to be mad at him, he's
not voting for all these tax cuts, aren't they good? It kind of reminds me
of going to a cafeteria. When I go to a cafeteria, everything I see looks
good. (Laughter.) But if I eat it all, I'll get sick. (Laughter.)
Now, that's what's going on here. So they talk about all these
wonderful tax cuts. If they become the law, there will be nothing left
from the projected surplus for a Medicare prescription drug benefit;
nothing left to lengthen the life of Social Security and Medicare, so when
the baby boomers retire we don't break our kids and our grandkids; nothing
left to invest in the education of our children.
There's something else I'd like to say that all of you can probably
identify with. This is a projected surplus. This is what we think we'll
get over the next 10 years. Did you ever get one of those letters from Ed
McMahon? (Laughter.) You know, it probably said, "You may have won $10
million." Did you ever get one? "You may have won $10 million." Now, if
you went out and spent the $10 million the next day, you should support
their plan. (Laughter.) But, if not, you ought to think again there.
When you cut these taxes, the money's gone. And I think it's wrong to
spend it all. Just this week, we released a report that showed that one of
their spending proposals, the total repeal of the estate tax, would benefit
only 4,300 families in Florida, with an average tax cut of $434,000. Now,
I think there ought to be some changes in the estate tax. I think the
rate's too high. I think too many family businesses are burdened by it.
And I'm all for changing it, I've offered to change it. But to completely
repeal it without taking account of the need here for prescription drugs is
a big mistake.
While 4,300 families in Florida would benefit from the estate tax
repeal, the Medicare prescription drug benefit would provide affordable
coverage to more than 2.7 million seniors and people with disabilities in
Florida. Their average income is $18,600.
Even by Congress's own optimistic efforts, I will say again, these tax
bills leave nothing for Medicare, for lengthening the life of Social
Security, and for the drug program, or for education for our children, plus
which, they'd make it impossible for us to pay this country out of debt by
2012. One of the things I've been trying to do is get us out of debt. We
quadrupled the debt of the country in the 12 years before I took office,
and we're trying to get rid of it. If we get rid of it, interest rates
will be lower, incomes will be higher, people will pay less for home
mortgages -- $250 billion over 10 years, by our estimates -- less for car
loans, less for college loans. That's the equivalent of a big tax cut,
lower interest rates. So I think this is very, very important.
Now, there is a better way. The budget that I gave the Congress
continues our fiscal discipline. It would get us out of debt by 2012, for
the first time since 1835, and it would put us in great shape for the 21st
century. It would extend the life of the Social Security trust fund by
more than 50 years. It would extend the life of Medicare by over 30 years
-- Medicare was supposed to go broke last year when I took office.
It provides, believe it or not, tax cuts -- affordable tax cuts -- to
help people send their kids to college, pay for long-term care for the
elderly and disabled -- a big deal -- pay for child care, pay for
retirement savings, allow people between the ages of 55 and 65 to buy into
Medicare and give them a tax benefit to do so, because so many of them have
lost their insurance, and provide marriage penalty tax relief. And believe
it or not, our plan only costs one-fourth as much as theirs does, but it
would provide more benefits to 80 percent of the people.
So there is a way to have a tax cut here and have the money to pay for
the Medicare prescription drug program, to lengthen the life of Medicare
and Social Security, to invest in the education of our children. And
believe it or not, I still leave a lot of this projected surplus alone, in
my budget, in case it doesn't materialize, or in case it does materialize,
the next President and the next Congress can make a judgment about what to
do with it. I just don't believe in spending all this money before it
comes in. We've tried it before and it didn't work out too well.
So I hope that all of you will raise your voices. This is not a
partisan political issue in America. When you go to the pharmacist to fill
a prescription, nobody asks you whether you voted Republican or Democrat
for the last 40 years. Nobody asks whether you vote at all. You're just a
person and you need the medicine. It should not be a partisan political
issue in Washington. We have the money; we can do it, provide a tax cut,
invest in our children, and still get the country out of debt. All we have
to do is decide what our priorities are, how much we care about it, how
much people like the people on this stage and in this room matter to us,
and what kind of America we want to live in.
So I ask you all, because it's not a partisan issue out here, do what
you can with your senators and your representatives, raise your voices,
tell them it shouldn't be a partisan issue in Washington. You've got a lot
of lives depending on it. And it's only going to become more and more
You know, we're on the verge of breakthroughs for Parkinson's, for
various kinds of cancers, with the Human Genome Project, which I'm sure you
read about -- we've now sequenced the human gene in its entirety -- it
won't be long in the next 10 years, it's going to take your breath away
what we learn how to correct in terms of human health problems.
I believe that these young children here will, themselves, have
children that will have a life expectancy at birth in excess of 90 years.
But if we want to do this -- this is a high-class problem -- I believe
people with disabilities will find ways to remedy a lot of the disabilities
and they will be able to live longer and better lives and have more
options. But all of that will require us to rely more heavily on medicine
-- not less, more.
We have put this off long enough. We finally have the money to do it.
And I think, as a country, we're morally obligated to do it. So I ask you
to raise your voices, stick with us, let's keep working on it until we get
Thank you and God bless you. (Applause.)
END 12:20 P.M. EDT
President and First Lady | Vice President and Mrs. Gore
Record of Progress | The Briefing Room
Gateway to Government | Contacting the White House
White House for Kids | White House History
White House Tours | Help | Text Only