| This Statement of Administration Policy provides the Administration's views
on H.R. 4274, the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Bill, FY 1999, as reported by the House
Appropriations Committee.  Your consideration of the Administration's views
would be appreciated. 
Due to the very serious funding and language issues present in the
Committee bill, discussed below, the President would veto the bill in its
current form.  The manager's amendment made in order in the rule is wholly
inadequate in addressing these concerns.
 
The only way to achieve the appropriate investment level for programs
funded by this bill is to offset discretionary spending by using savings in
other areas.  The President's FY 1999 Budget proposes levels of
discretionary spending for FY 1999 that conform to the Bipartisan Budget
Agreement by making savings through user fees and certain mandatory
programs to help finance this spending.  In the Transportation Equity Act,
Congress -- on a broad, bipartisan basis -- took similar action in
approving funding for surface transportation programs paid for with
mandatory offsets.  In addition, this year, as in the past, such mandatory
offsets have been approved by the House and the Senate in other
appropriations bills.  We want to work with the Congress on
mutually-agreeable mandatory and other offsets that could be used to
increase funding for high-priority discretionary programs, including those
funded by this bill.  In addition, we hope that the House will reduce
funding for lower priority discretionary programs and redirect funding to
programs of higher priority.
 
Department of Education
 
The Committee bill cuts $2 billion from the President's overall request for
education program funding.  As a result, the bill does not adequately
support the Nation's efforts to raise student achievement, make schools
safe, and improve the capabilities of teachers.  High priority programs
inadequately funded include (listed in bill order):
 
      In addition to inadequate funding for priority education programs, the
Administration is concerned with several language provisions of the
Committee bill that would severely restrict the Administration's ability to
continue the development of programs designed to raise academic standards.Goals 2000.  Funding for Goals 2000 is cut $255 million
     below the President's request, which would reverse momentum in all 50
     States to raise academic standards and deny 6,000 schools serving over
     three million students the funds needed to implement innovative
     education reforms.
      School-to-Work.  School-to-Work is cut by a total of $100
     million (between the Departments of Education and Labor) below the
     President's $250 million request, which would seriously hamper all
     States' efforts to help young people of all backgrounds move from high
     school to careers or postsecondary training and education.
      Technology in Education.  The Committee's $137 million
     reduction from the request would make it increasingly difficult for
     States to meet school children's education technology needs,
     especially in training teachers to integrate educational technology
     into their curriculum effectively.
      Title I (Education for the Disadvantaged) Grants to Local
     Educational Agencies.  The Committee bill cuts $392 million from
     the request, which would leave nearly 520,000 students in high-poverty
     communities without the extra help they need to master the basics and
     develop the capability to reach high academic standards.
      Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities.  The
     Committee's $50 million reduction would deny funding for School
     Coordinators in nearly one-half of the Nation's middle schools needed
     to implement effective drug and violence prevention programs.
      Education Opportunity Zones.  The Committee bill does not
     provide the requested $200 million, which would deny high-poverty
     urban and rural districts the extra assistance they need to implement
     effective reforms with tough accountability for performance.
      America Reads.  America Reads is denied the $210 million
     provided in last year's Bipartisan Budget Agreement for children's
     literacy and denied the additional $50 million the President
     requested.  These funds would prevent thousands of young children from
     receiving the extra help they need to learn to read well and
     independently by the end of the third grade.
      Bilingual Education.  The Committee has cut by $25 million
     the President's plan for training teachers to help limited-English
     proficient children.
      Work-Study.  Roughly 57,000 needy students would be denied
     the opportunity to work to finance their college education because of
     the Committee's $50 million reduction.
      Higher Education Initiatives.  No funds are provided for
     three Presidential initiatives for which the President has requested
     $237 million:
           GEAR UP to help prepare students at high poverty
          middle schools for college.
           Learning Anytime Anywhere Partnership grants for
          pilot projects using distance learning technology.
           New teacher recruitment and preparation programs.
 
      Eisenhower Professional Development.  The Committee's $50
     million reduction would leave over 100,000 teachers without the
     training they need to help them teach to rigorous academic standards.
      After School programs (21st Century Community Learning
     Centers).  A $140 million cut from the President's request to this
     program, part of the President's child care initiative, would result
     in 3,000 fewer centers and no services to nearly 400,000 children.
      Hispanic Initiative. The Administration has proposed
     funding increases of more than $600 million for a series of programs,
     including Title I (Education for the Disadvantaged), to enhance the
     educational achievement of Hispanic Americans.  The bill reduces the
     request by nearly $500 million, including some of the cuts described
     above as well as significant decreases from the request in Adult
     Education, Bilingual Education, Hispanic Serving Institutions, and
     Comprehensive School Reform Demonstrations.  Funding for these
     programs should be restored to the level of the President's request.
      Civil Rights Enforcement.  Ensuring that civil rights laws
     and regulations are adequately enforced is a fundamental
     responsibility of government.  The Committee fails to provide the
     increase of $6.5 million (for a total of $68 million) requested by the
     Office for Civil Rights in the Education Department and reduced by
     $2.4 million the request for $67.8 million for the Labor Department's
     Office of Federal Contract Compliance.  Both activities should be
     restored to the full requests.
 
      Department of LaborNational Tests.  The Administration strongly objects to
     the language limitation and $15 million funding cut that would bring a
     halt to the President's efforts to help States and parents raise
     academic standards through a voluntary national test.  The Committee
     bill's language would prohibit the development, implementation, and
     administration of the tests unless explicitly authorized.  The
     language prohibition should be deleted and the funding restored.
      Unfocused Block Grants.  The Administration strongly
     objects to language that would, in effect, turn the Goals 2000 and the
     Eisenhower Professional Development programs into block grants by
     allowing those funds to be used under the broad Title VI block grant
     authority.  Title VI has no performance or accountability standards.
     The language should be deleted so that these Federal funds can address
     national needs and continue to be guided by strong accountability
     measures.
      Special Education (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
     -- IDEA).  The bill contains two objectionable IDEA  riders.  One
     would undermine the due process protections and parental rights for
     disabled students who are regarded as violent.  The other would, in
     effect, allow States to discontinue special education services for
     youth ages 18 to 21 in adult prisons, violating the principle that all
     disabled youth ages three to 21 have a right to a free, appropriate
     public education and undermining the Department of Education's ability
     to enforce the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.  Both
     provisions would unnecessarily re-open IDEA before last year's
     bipartisan reauthorization has had a chance to be implemented and
     fairly assessed.  Both provisions should be stricken.
      Bilingual Education.  While we agree with the Committee on
     the need for some reforms to Bilingual Education, we are opposed to
     any provision that would set an absolute limit on student
     participation in bilingual education or alternative programs.  Such a
     step would deny help to students who need it and violate the civil
     rights of Limited English Proficient students to an equal education.
     Because of individual differences, students will vary in how long it
     takes to develop English proficiency.  We are also opposed to
     provisions that would establish a two-year goal for becoming
     proficient in English, since research has shown that this timetable is
     unrealistically short.
      Internet Access in Schools and Libraries.  The bill
     contains objectionable language that would deny Federal funds to
     schools and libraries that have not installed software on their
     computers to block Internet access to indecent materials to minors.
     While the Administration strongly supports efforts to ensure that
     schools and libraries protect minors from indecent materials, it
     objects to such overly prescriptive language.  Many  local education
     agencies have already developed their own acceptable-use policies that
     are not based on software.  Instead, the Administration favors less
     burdensome and restrictive language that would require that schools
     and libraries develop their own acceptable-use plans at the local
     level and certify their implementation.
 
The Administration has strong concerns with the inadequate funding levels
provided for the following Labor programs (listed in bill order):
 
      The Committee bill contains several objectionable language riders
addressing regulatory issues in the Department of Labor.  These include
language imposing new, unnecessary, and burdensome review procedures before
the Department can issue Black Lung regulations and a continuation of the
rider that prohibits MSHA from enforcing training requirements at certain
mines, which have a growing numbers of deaths.  These riders would make it
more difficult for the Department of Labor to carry out its programs and
should be dropped.Adult Job Training.  The Committee has provided none of
     the requested increases for the Dislocated Worker ($100 million) and
     low-income adult ($45 million) job training programs.  Freezing these
     programs would mean that some 67,000 fewer workers in need of
     assistance would be helped.  Without the requested increases, early
     implementation of the Workforce Investment Act could be jeopardized.
      Summer Jobs Program.  The Administration strongly opposes
     the Committee's elimination of the Summer Jobs program.  The
     President's request of $871 million for this program could finance up
     to 530,000 summer jobs for economically disadvantaged youth.  The
     unemployment rate for teens continues to far exceed the overall
     unemployment rate.  The Summer Jobs program plays a vital role in
     supporting employment among these teens, especially among
     African-American youths -- approximately 25 percent of summer jobs
     held by African-American 14-15 year olds come through this program --
     and serves as a valuable introduction to the world of work.  We urge
     the House to restore the full request for this program.
      President's Youth Opportunity Areas Initiative.  The
     Committee provides no funding for the President's Youth Opportunity
     Areas initiative and rescinds the $250 million appropriated last year
     for this program.  This program would address the problem of pervasive
     joblessness in high-poverty neighborhoods by making large investments
     in these areas to effect community-wide change and help 50,000
     out-of-school youth.  We  oppose elimination of this program, which is
     an essential component of the Administration's Empowerment
     Zones/Enterprise Communities initiative.  We strongly urge the House
     to fully fund this initiative that was recently enacted with strong
     bipartisan support as past of the Workforce Investment Act.
      Unemployment Insurance.  The House Committee mark does not
     fund the $91 million requested for the Unemployment Insurance (UI)
     integrity initiative.  This initiative was authorized in the Balanced
     Budget Act of 1997 and would, over the next five years, achieve $758
     million in mandatory savings.  Failure to fund this initiative would
     mean a continuation of errors in benefit payments and UI taxes.  A
     similar initiative in the Social Security Administration's Disability
     Insurance program has proven to be a cost effective approach to
     achieving program savings.
      Worker Protection.  The Committee has cut nearly in half
     the requested increase for programs that protect our workers on the
     job.  For example, the Committee mark for the Occupational Safety and
     Health Administration (OSHA) redirects resources to State consultation
     and is nine-percent below the requested level for Federal enforcement,
     while funding for the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) is
     frozen at the 1998 level and virtually no funding is provided to the
     Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration (PWBA) for implementing
     the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.  We
     urge the House to restore financing for such critical workplace
     protection programs.
      Child Labor.  The Committee has cut by 85 percent the
     requested increase for programs that combat child labor abuses
     domestically and internationally.  For example, the Committee mark
     provides only $3 million of the $30 million requested increase for the
     Bureau of International Labor Affairs to increase its contributions to
     the International Labor Organization's International Programme for the
     Elimination of Child Labor.  The Committee also provides no funds for
     the request for demonstration programs that would provide alternatives
     to field work for migrant youth.  We urge the House to restore
     financing for programs that strive to eliminate child labor abuses.
      OSHA Peer Review.  The Committee bill includes language
     that requires a peer review panel for all proposed OSHA regulations.
     This provision is unnecessary, overly broad, and would further delay
     OSHA's process for issuing regulations.  OSHA already has an extensive
     public hearing process where any interested party may testify.  OSHA
     must address all significant issues raised.  The agency conducts peer
     reviews when appropriate.  The Administration strongly urges the House
     to drop this provision.
 
Department of Health and Human Services
 
The Administration appreciates the Committee's efforts to provide much
needed funding for important programs crucial to the healthy lives of all
Americans.  Unfortunately, the Committee has not provided adequate funding
for several important programs of the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).  The Administration has strong concerns with the inadequate
funding levels provided for the following HHS programs (listed in bill
order):
 
      In addition, the Committee bill contains several language provisions that
are troubling to the Administration.Prevention Research.  The Committee has provided only $10
     million of the $25 million requested for the Centers for Disease
     Control to expand research in ways to prevent disease and reduce the
     need for medical care.
      Bio-Terrorism.  The Administration urges the House to
     provide the full $111 million requested to improve HHS' ability to
     respond to attacks of biological and chemical terrorism.
      National Household Survey on Drug Abuse.  The Committee
     mark eliminates funding for data collection activities of the
     Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, including
     the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, which is our single best
     source of information on youth drug use and youth smoking and is
     important for evaluating the impact of substance abuse prevention,
     treatment, and enforcement efforts.
      Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA).  Although the
     Committee has fully funded the President's program level request for
     HCFA Program Management (with the exception of the Medicare+Choice
     information campaign), no action has been taken on the $265 million in
     new discretionary HCFA user fees.  We urge the House to enact the
     President's requested user fees to finance HCFA activities and to
     ensure that sufficient resources remain available for education and
     other priorities.
      Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP).  The
     Committee would eliminate funding for LIHEAP.  Over 36 percent of
     LIHEAP households have elderly residents, 32 percent have disabled
     residents, 27 percent have children under the age of six, and 27
     percent are the working poor who do not receive any other public
     assistance.  The Administration urges the House to restore funds to
     the President's requested level.
      Child Care.  The Administration urges the House to provide
     the additional $174 million requested for a child care initiative that
     will improve the availability of affordable, quality child care for
     working parents.  This initiative would provide States with resources
     to enhance child care health and safety standards enforcement, give
     child care workers scholarships  to improve their skills, and increase
     our commitment to understand better and evaluate how our Nation's
     child care system is working.  Likewise, we ask the House to restore
     funds to the President's requested level for a $5 million program
     designed to assist States in developing support systems for families
     of children with disabilities.
      Head Start.  The Committee funds Head Start at $4.5
     billion, $160 million below the President's request -- denying slots
     to up to 25,000 low-income children in FY 1999 and undermining efforts
     to serve one million children by the year 2002.  Head Start has a
     track record of success in readying disadvantaged children for school,
     supporting working families by helping parents to get involved in
     their children's lives and providing services to the entire family.
     We urge the House to restore Head Start funding to the President's
     requested level.
      Foster Care and Adoption Assistance.  The Committee bill
     fails to provide the Administration's request for a $200 million
     contingency reserve.  This language is critical to ensure grant awards
     should the definite appropriations be insufficient for authorized
     eligible expenditures in either Foster Care or Adoption Assistance.
     The House should restore funding to the requested level of $200
     million, or approximately four percent of total program costs.
      Health Disparities.  The Committee has failed to include
     $30 million requested for demonstration projects to address racial and
     ethnic health disparities in infant mortality, cancer, diabetes, heart
     disease and stroke, HIV/AIDS, and immunizations.
 
      Social Security AdministrationAbortion.  The Administration urges the House to strike
     sections 508 and 509 of the Committee bill, which would prohibit the
     use of funds for abortion.  The President believes that abortion
     should be safe, legal, and rare.  These provisions would continue to
     limit the range of conditions under which a woman's health would
     permit access to abortion services.  Furthermore, section 509 requires
     a physician to make a legal determination that these conditions have
     been met.  The Administration proposes to work with the Congress to
     address the issue of abortion funding.
      Organ Donation.  The Administration strongly opposes two
     provisions of the Committee bill that would suspend two HHS rules
     pertaining to organ donation:  a HCFA rule that seeks to expand the
     number of organs available for donation through more vigorous
     procurement efforts; and, a Health Resources and Services
     Administration rule that would require the national organ transplant
     network to develop policies that would allocate organs based on
     patients' medical need, not their geographic location.
      Family Planning/Other Potential Health Riders.  We
     understand that several amendments affecting Medicare, Medicaid, and
     public health programs may be introduced on the House floor that could
     have a detrimental effect on the Administration's ability to
     administer its responsibilities efficiently and equitably.  We urge
     restraint in the consideration of these issues.
      The Administration strongly objects to language in the House
     Committee bill, and to any related potential amendments, that would
     have the effect of requiring family planning or other health care
     grantees to obtain parental consent or provide advance notification to
     parents before giving contraceptives to minors.  Mandating parental
     consent discourages minors from seeking health care and reproductive
     services and thus leads to more unintended pregnancies, abortions, and
     sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV.  The Administration
     urges the House to adopt the proposed Castle/Greenwood amendment,
     which will ensure that grantees will encourage minors to seek their
     family's participation in family planning decisions.
 
      Needle Exchange.  The Committee includes a total ban on
     the use of funds appropriated in this Act for needle exchange programs
     rather than making the use of funds for such programs conditional upon
     the certification of the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
      Office of AIDS Research.  The Committee bill does not
     appropriate a specific amount for AIDS research through a single
     appropriation for the National Institutes of Health's (NIH's) Office
     of AIDS Research.  The single appropriation would help NIH plan and
     target research funds effectively, minimizing duplication and
     inefficiencies across the 21 institutes and centers that carry out
     HIV/AIDS research.
      Medicaid Drug Coverage.  The Committee bill would prohibit
     HCFA from paying for a specific pharmaceutical agent under Medicaid
     except for post-surgical treatment.  We oppose the use of the
     appropriations process to make selective coverage determinations and
     judgments regarding how best to treat specific medical problems.
     Further, the provision is unnecessary because the Secretary already
     has authority to limit coverage for pharmaceutical agents if
     prescribed inappropriately, and States already have broad latitude to
     limit the use of drugs under Federal law through drug utilization
     review and prior authorization programs.
      Social Services Block Grant.  The Administration opposes a
     provision that would restrict State authority to transfer Temporary
     Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) funds to SSBG in FY 1999 to no
     more than the amounts transferred by individual States in FY 1998.
     Enacting such a provision so late in FY 1998 would inequitably limit
     State flexibility for the future.
 
The Committee bill does not provide $19 million for administrative
expenses, contingent on the authorization of a user fee for services
provided by the Social Security Administration to attorneys who represent
claimants for benefits.  These services include withholding money from
certain past due benefits and issuing payments to certain claimant
representatives.  The Administration continues to support enactment of this
user fee and appropriation of the anticipated collections for
administrative expenses.
 
In addition, the Committee bill does not provide $50 million for
administrative expenses for the conduct of additional non-disability
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) redeterminations of eligibility.  These
resources and the resulting redeterminations are essential to ensuring the
integrity of the SSI program and reducing unnecessary benefit payments.
Failure to provide this funding would result in serious staffing
shortfalls.
 
Other Agencies
 
      National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).  The Committee
     provides funding for the  NLRB at the FY 1997 level.  This would
     result in a loss of over 100 staff, an increase in case backlogs, and
     could result in furloughs and office closings.  This reduction would
     cripple an agency key to protecting workers' rights on the job, and we
     urge the House to restore the NLRB to the requested level.
      Section 516 amends the National Labor Relations Act to require the
     NLRB to adjust its dollar jurisdictional standards for inflation on
     October 1, 1998, and every five years thereafter.  This change would
     deny workers in some small businesses the protection
     afforded to others to organize and bargain collectively.  This change
     to substantive law raising the jurisdictional thresholds more than
     five-fold should not be done through the appropriations process, but
     only after hearings and debate.  The Administration urges the House to
     drop this provision.
 
      Corporation for National and Community Service.  The
     Administration is deeply concerned about the Committee's $27 million
     reduction to the request for the Corporation for National and
     Community Service.  This reduction freezes the Corporation's Senior
     Service program at the FY 1998 level and cuts VISTA $5 million below
     FY 1998.  These reductions would deny more than 500 VISTA members the
     opportunity to serve in low-income communities Nation-wide and would
     reduce the number of seniors serving their communities by 15,000.  The
     Administration urges the House to fully fund the Corporation at the
     $279 million level proposed in the FY 1999 Budget.
      Corporation for Public Broadcasting.  The Administration
     strongly objects to the lack of funding provided for the President's
     initiative to assist public broadcasters in converting  to digital
     technology.  The transition to digital technology promises to create
     tremendous opportunities for expanded and enhanced educational and
     public service programming while promoting innovative technology
     applications.  Providing the Corporation with funding in FY 1999 will
     allow public broadcasting to convert to digital technology on a
     schedule similar to that of commercial stations.  This will facilitate
     fundraising efforts and allow public broadcasters to participate in
     the establishment of digital standards.
      Railroad Retirement Board (RRB).  The Committee bill does
     not include language to provide the RRB with authority to offer
     voluntary separation incentive payments (or "buyouts") through the end
     of calendar year 1998.  RRB's experience has shown that reducing
     employment through buyouts is much less disruptive to agency
     operations than conducting a reduction-in-force.  The Administration
     urges the House to provide this buyout authority.
      The Committee bill includes language prohibiting the RRB Inspector
     General from using funds for any audit, investigation, or review of
     the Medicare program.  The Administration believes that this language
     should be dropped.  RRB has statutory authority to administer a
     separate contract for RRB, Part B Medicare claims.  As long as RRB has
     authority to negotiate and administer a separate Medicare contract,
     the RRB Inspector General ought not to be prohibited from using funds
     to review, audit, or investigate activity related to that contract.
 |