This is historical material, "frozen in time."
The web site is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages will not work.
This is historical material, "frozen in time."
The web site is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages will not work.
This is historical material, "frozen in time."
The web site is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages will not work.
BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
OMB COST ESTIMATE
FOR PAY-AS-YOU-GO CALCULATIONS
LAW NUMBER: P.L.106-417 (S. 406)
BILL TITLE: Alaska Native and American Indian
Direct Reimbursement Act
BILL PURPOSE: Establishes a permanent program
that allows all tribes, tribal
organizations, and Alaska Native health organizations that operate Indian Health Services
(IHS) hospitals and clinics to directly bill medicare, medicaid, and other third party
payers.
OMB ESTIMATE: In 1998, the Indian
Health Care Improvement Act Amendments
authorized a demonstration project that allowed four tribally-operated IHS facilities to
directly bill the medicare and medicaid programs and other third party payers rather than
submit their claims through the IHS. Under the direct billing system, payments to the
demonstration participants were higher due both to quicker reimbursement and improved
claims processing. P.L. 106-417 makes the program permanent and expands it to include
all Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and Alaska Native health organizations that operate
IHS facilities. OMB estimates that the Act will increase direct spending by $47 million
over 5 years.
(Fiscal years; in millions of
dollars)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Net costs...............
0
4
5
10
13
15
CBO ESTIMATE:
(Fiscal years; in millions of dollars)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Net costs...............
0
9
8
8
8
8
EXPLANATION OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OMB AND CBO ESTIMATES:
In 2001 and 2002, OMB estimates lower net costs than CBO because it assumes that
facilities will be slower to switch to direct billing. In subsequent years, OMB assumes
more induced billing as a result of the shift and higher growth rates, yielding higher costs
under OMB pricing.
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUE LEGISLATION
ENACTED TO DATE:
(Fiscal years; in millions of dollars)
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Outlay effect..............
34
1,153
2,184
7,151
7,852
8,024
Receipt effect............
-8
-689
-808
-870
-922
-924
Net costs....................
42
1,842
2,992
8,021
8,774
8,948
*$500,000 or less.
NOTE: The cumulative effect of direct
spending and revenue legislation enacted to date is
currently estimated to result in an end-of-session sequester. The Administration looks forward to
working with the Congress to ensure that an unintended sequester does not occur.