| 
 OMB COST ESTIMATEFOR PAY-AS-YOU-GO CALCULATIONS
 Report No:   501    Date:     01/03/00
 LAW NUMBER:   P.L.106-170 (H.R.1180)BILL TITLE: Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement ActBILL PURPOSE: (1) Amends the current vocational rehabilitation and referral system byestablishing Ticket to Work and Self-Sufficiency Program within the Social SecurityAdministration; (2) expands eligibility for medicaid and medicare benefits for certainindividuals with disabilities who work; and (3) extends various tax provisions scheduledto expire by January 1, 2000.OMB ESTIMATE:  |  | (Fiscal years; in millions of dollars) |  |  | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 |  | Tax extensions................ | 0 | 2,300 | 6,537 | 5,717 | 3,237 | 2,791 |  | Other revenues................ | 0 | -2,394 | -1,671 | 1,874 | -300 | -209 |  | Outlays............................ | 0 | 14 | 8 | -41 | -4 | 46 |  | Total................................ | 0 | - 80 | 4,874 | 7,550 | 2,933 | 2,628 |  | Memorandum: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Off-budget impact........... | 0 | -21 | -46 | -41 | -32 | -29 | 
 	P.L. 106-170 extends a number of tax provisions that were due to expire by January 1,2000.  OMB estimates that the extension of these provisions reduces revenue by $2.3billion in 2000 and $20.6 billion over the years 1999 through 2004.  In 2000, this revenueloss is offset by increasing the estimated "safe harbor" tax payments for individuals withadjusted gross income of over $150,000 and other revenue changes. P.L. 106-170 alsoimproves work incentives for individuals with disabilities, such as establishing a ticket towork and self-sufficiency program and expanding health benefits for certain individuals.On net, OMB estimates that the Act increases on-budget outlays by $23 million over thepay-as-you-go window.  The Act also yields net savings in off-budget accounts, whichare not scored for pay-as-you-go purposes.	 CBO ESTIMATE:  |  | (Fiscal years; in millions of dollars) |  |  | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 |  | Tax extensions................. | 0 | 1,983 | 4,499 | 6,363 | 2,820 | 2,385 |  | Other revenues................ | 0 | -2,099 | -1,653 | 1,742 | -429 | -222 |  | Outlays............................ | 0 | 18 | 52 | -16 | 13 | 46 |  | Total................................ | 0 | -97 | 2,899 | 8,089 | 2,404 | 2,210 |  | Memorandum: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Off-budget impact........... | 0 | 32 | 76 | 12 | -24 | -25 | 
 	 EXPLANATION OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OMB AND CBO ESTIMATES:  	Over the period 1999 through 2004, CBO estimates net pay-as-you-go costs of $15.5billion for P.L. 106-170; while OMB estimates $17.9 billion. Most of this difference isthe result of different scoring of tax extension provisions, primarily for extensions of theresearch and experimentation tax credit and Subpart F for active financing income.  Thesedifferences are the result of different baselines and estimating models. CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUE LEGISLATIONENACTED TO DATE:|  | (Fiscal years; in millions of dollars) |  |  | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 |  | Outlay effect.............. | 53 | 681 | 968 | 562 | 810 | 17 |  | Receipt effect............ | -5 | 3,753 | -3,087 | -6,822 | -952 | -2,545 |  | Net costs.................... | 58 | -3,072 | 4,055 | 7,384 | 1,762 | 2,562 | 
 Return to the OMB page
         
 		The Budget	 | 		Legislative Information	 | 		Management Reform/GPRA		Grants Management
 Financial Management		 | 		Procurement Policy		 | 		Information & Regulatory Policy
 Contact the White House Web Master
 
 Privacy Statement
 |