| 
 | 
|    | 
| November 25, 1998 The Honorable Al Gore Dear Mr. President:         The Balanced Budget and
		Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Section 251 (a) (7)), as amended by the
		Budget Enforcement Act of 1997, requires that OMB submit a report to Congress
		on appropriations legislation within seven days of enactment. Section 252(d)
		requires that OMB submit a report to Congress on direct spending or receipts
		legislation within seven days of enactment. Enclosed are separate
		appropriations and pay-as-you-go reports for Public Law 105-277, which became
		law on October 21, 1998.   Jacob J. Lew  Enclosure  Identical Letter Sent to The Honorable Newt Gingrich  November 25, 1998  The Honorable Newt Gingrich Dear Mr. Speaker:         The Balanced Budget and
		Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Section 251 (a) (7)), as amended by the
		Budget Enforcement Act of 1997, requires that OMB submit a report to Congress
		on appropriations legislation within seven days of enactment. Section 252(d)
		requires that OMB submit a report to Congress on direct spending or receipts
		legislation within seven days of enactment. Enclosed are separate
		appropriations and pay-as-you-go reports for Public Law 105-277, which became
		law on October 21, 1998.   Jacob J. Lew  Enclosure  Identical Letter Sent to The Honorable Al Gore  NOTE:   This PAYGO
		report should proceed after table 12, page 39 of this
		7-Day-After-Report)  OMB COST ESTIMATE Report No: 471 
 For the bill as a whole, OMB estimates a net pay-as-you-go cost of $250 million in 1999, and a net savings of $7.6 billion over five years. CBO estimates a net savings of $80 million in 1999, and a net cost of $25 million over five years. OMB estimates a net increase in outlays of $32 million in 1999 and $1.9 billion over five years. CBO estimates a net increase in outlays of $121 million in 1999, and $1.1 billion over five years. OMB estimates a net reduction in receipts of $181 million in 1999, and a net revenue gain of $9.6 billion over five years. CBO estimates a net revenue gain of $201 million in 1999, and $1.1 billion over five years.  Of the five-year, $8.5 billion receipts difference, the largest
		difference is due to the provision restricting abusive liquidating REIT
		transactions. Over five years, OMB estimates receipt increases of $15 billion
		from this provision, while CBO estimates receipt increases of $5.6 billion.
		P.L. 105-277 required that OMB score this provision using the economic and
		technical assumptions used in preparing the FY 1999 Mid-Session Review (MSR)
		baseline receipts forecast. The OMB MSR receipts baseline contained an explicit
		adjustment for anticipated revenue losses associated with liquidating REIT
		transactions. It is believed that CBO's estimate was made relative to a
		baseline that did not fully capture the potential revenue erosion of these
		transactions. Because of the baseline differences, OMB estimates that the
		provision restricting liquidating REIT transactions raises significantly more
		revenue.   Partially offsetting the estimating difference for the liquidating REIT
		provision are differences in estimates for the extension of certain expiring
		tax and trade provisions and provisions relating to farmers. OMB estimates of
		the revenue loss for the tax and trade extensions and farming provisions exceed
		CBO's estimates by $886 million and $675 million, respectively. Technical
		modeling differences of the 1-year extension of a modified exception from
		subpart F for active financing income and the provision of a special 5-year net
		operating loss carryback period for farming losses account for most of the
		estimating differences.  There are differences between OMB and CBO scoring of the provisions affecting Medicare, veterans compensation, and TVA debt refinancing. For the Medicare provisions, CBO estimates $150 million in outlays in 1999 and $800 million over five years. OMB estimates 1999 outlays of $20 million, and five-year outlays of $710 million. In 2000, OMB estimates outlays of $510 million, while CBO estimates outlays of $2.0 billion. In 2001, OMB estimates outlays $480 million, while CBO estimates outlay savings of $1.1 billion. CBO's baseline assumes higher Medicare spending, and this accounts for the large differences in the home health estimates in 2000 and 2001. For veterans compensation, OMB and CBO differ in their assumptions of veterans behavior and how quickly the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) will implement the provision affecting benefits for Gulf War veterans. Based on experience with Agent Orange legislation, OMB assumes VA will process and grant more claims than CBO does. OMB estimates outlays of $502 million from 2001-2003, while CBO estimates outlays of $40 million over the same three years. For the TVA debt repayment provision, OMB assumes lower long-term interest rates and thus a higher market value for TVA's debt than does CBO. OMB estimates outlays of $94 million in 1999, and $690 million over five years. CBO estimates outlays of $16 million in 1999, and $306 million over five years. 
 
 		The Budget	 | 		Legislative Information	 | 		Management Reform/GPRA		 | ||||||