This Statement of Administration Policy provides the Administration's views on
H.R. 2267, the Departments of Commerce, Justice, State, the Judiciary, and
Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, FY 1998, as reported by the House
Appropriations Committee. Your consideration of the Administration's views
would be appreciated.
The Committee has developed a bill that provides requested funding for many of
the Administration's priorities. For example, we appreciate the Committee's
funding of law enforcement programs in general and the COPS program in
particular. Funding COPS at the requested level of $1.4 billion is consistent
with the Bipartisan Budget Agreement and would enable us to achieve the goal of
hiring 100,000 additional police officers by the year 2000.
As discussed below, the Administration will seek restoration of certain of the
Committee's reductions. We recognize that it will not be possible in all cases
to attain the Administration's full request and will work with the House toward
achieving acceptable funding levels. The Administration is committed to
working with the House to identify reductions in the bill in order to find
offsets for the restoration of funds that the Administration seeks. For
example, funding could be reduced for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant and
the new Juvenile Justice Block Grant. We urge the House to reduce funding for
lower priority programs, or for programs that would be adequately funded at the
requested level, and to redirect funding to programs of higher priority.
The Administration is particularly concerned about the objectionable funding
level provided for the Legal Services Corporation and language that would
prohibit any funds from being used for activities related to the design,
planning, testing, or implementation of sampling in the 2000 Census, and would
further require the passage of an authorization bill prior to the expenditure
of more than $100 million for any 2000 decennial planning operations. As
discussed below, if the bill presented to the President were to contain the
funding level provided in the Committee bill for the Legal Services Corporation
or the aforementioned restrictions on Census activities, his senior advisers
would recommend that the President veto the bill.
Department of Commerce
- Census Sampling. The Administration strongly opposes the
Committee's language that would prohibit any funds from being used for
activities related to the design, planning, testing, or implementation of
sampling in the 2000 Census, and would further require the passage of an
authorization bill prior to the expenditure of more than $100 million for any
2000 decennial planning operations. This represents an unprecedented and
unacceptable attempt to micromanage the decennial census. Such restrictions
would seriously undermine decennial census planning operations, especially with
regard to address list development, procurement, and the 1998 Decennial Dress
Rehearsal. The President's senior advisers have indicated that they would
recommend that the President veto the bill if it were to contain this
provision.
While the Administration will continue to consult with Congress on this
important issue, we also remain committed to the use of sampling to ensure the
most accurate decennial census possible. Without the limited use of sampling,
the accuracy of the census would decrease significantly, especially with regard
to children and minority groups that have been traditionally undercounted. The
National Academy of Sciences, the General Accounting Office, the Commerce
Department Inspector General, and the vast majority of the professional
statistical community support the use of sampling in the decennial census.
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. We are
disappointed that the Committee bill would provide only $8 million of the $22
million requested for the President's Clean Water Initiative, which helps
protect coastal communities from pollutants. The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is the primary trustee of our Nation's
coastal resources and, as such, plays an important role in this initiative.
The $22 million initiative builds from NOAA's unique coastal responsibilities
and partnerships with States and other Federal Trustee agencies. In addition,
we are disappointed that the Committee has not included any funding for the
Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment Program (GLOBE).
This program was developed to increase understanding of the Earth and has
already formed partnerships with over 2,500 U.S. schools and 35 other
countries, involving thousands of students across the U.S. and worldwide. The
Committee is recommending over $30 million in funding for NOAA activities not
requested by the Administration. We strongly urge that a portion of these
funds should be redirected to continue the Clean Water Initiative, GLOBE, and
other priorities such as fisheries conservation and management.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The
Administration greatly appreciates the overall funding level for NIST and the
Committee's support of the Bipartisan Budget Agreement. However, we strongly
urge the House to drop language restricting new Advanced Technology Program
awards and to adopt language allowing continued Federal funding for
Manufacturing Extension Centers beyond six years, as was passed by the House in
H.R. 1274.
- National Information Infrastructure (NII). The Administration urges
the House to reallocate resources between the NII grants program and the Public
Broadcasting Facilities program. The Committee mark substantially reduces
funding for the former and provides a large, unrequested increase for the
latter. The NII program is meritorious, providing seed money for innovative
projects that deploy, use, and evaluate advanced telecommunications and
information technology.
Legal Services Corporation
The Administration finds the Committee bill's funding level for the Legal
Services Corporation (LSC) unacceptable. The bill would fund the LSC at $141
million, $142 million below the FY 1997 enacted level and $199 million below
the President's request of $340 million. The amount that the Committee bill
would provide, 65 percent below the FY 1995 level of $400 million, would
cripple the program and call into question the Federal Government's commitment
to ensuring that all Americans, regardless of income, have access to the
judicial system. The Administration strongly urges the House to fully fund the
President's request. The President's senior advisers would recommend that he
veto the bill if it contained the funding level in the Committee bill.
Department of Justice
- Drug Courts and Drug Testing. The Administration is disappointed by
the failure of the Committee to provide any of the $45 million requested
increase for drug courts. The drug courts program is a proven, cost-effective
means of using the coercive power of the courts to move non-violent offenders
into drug treatment programs. Also, the President's budget would provide $30
million to offset the costs associated with drug testing State and local
arrestees. The Administration is concerned that the Committee does not
identify $30 million from the Byrne Grant program for the State and local
portion of the drug testing program, as proposed by the President. The drug
courts and drug testing programs could be restored to the requested levels by
reducing the Committee's funding for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
program. Finally, last year the Congress enacted legislation that requires
States to implement drug testing and intervention programs as a condition for
receiving Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth-In-Sentencing (VOI/TIS)
grants. The Administration now urges the Committee to provide funding for the
prisoner and parolee drug testing and intervention mandate by allowing States
to offset the cost with VOI/TIS funding.
- Juvenile Justice Block Grant. The Administration appreciates the
Committee's desire to provide additional support for juvenile justice
programs. However, the Administration is concerned that the $300 million block
grant program may authorize a broad and unfocused range of spending and urges
the House to target $100 million for the prosecutorial grant program, which is
designed to facilitate the cooperation and coordination of prosecutors and
police with school officials, probation officers, youth social service
professionals, and community members in an effort to reduce the incidence of
gang activity and violent juvenile crime. The Administration also urges the
House to target $50 million for the violent youth court program, which is
designed to develop initiatives for use by the courts and court-related
entities, such as probation and parole offices and victim/witness centers, to
enhance and expedite the handling of youth violence cases.
The Judiciary: Ninth Circuit
The Administration understands that one or more amendments to divide the Ninth
Circuit may be proposed. The Administration strongly objects to using the
appropriations process to legislate on this important matter. The division of
the Ninth Circuit is an important issue not just for the bench and the bar of
the affected region, but also for the citizens of the Ninth Circuit. The
Administration believes that a much better approach would be passage of
legislation, H.R. 908 -- already passed by the House and currently pending at
the desk in the Senate -- that would create a bipartisan commission to study
this difficult and complex question and make recommendations to the Congress
within a date certain. This would allow for substantive resolution of the iss
ue in a deliberative manner, allowing all affected parties to voice their views.
Department of State
The Administration appreciates the Committee's support for the State
Department's accounts that fund diplomatic and consular activities, which would
help reverse the erosion of the Department's worldwide operations. We are also
pleased that the Committee provided the transfers as requested to support the
International Cooperative Administrative Support Services (ICASS) program.
While the Administration welcomes the first-year funding of $100 million for
arrears payments, we are deeply concerned about reductions in the funding
levels for the FY 1998 annual assessments provided in Contributions to
International Organizations and Contributions for International Peacekeeping
Activities (CIPA). United States leadership in these organizations on a host
of issues of importance to the American people will be compromised if we fail
to meet our binding obligations to them. It is important that funding for
these activities be protected so that the Administration can pay annual costs,
avoid new arrears, and be given some flexibility to address unforeseen needs
relating to peace and security around the world. While we appreciate report
language that underscores the importance of funding for arrears as part of
long-term reform efforts, we are disappointed that the bill does not provide a
commitment for three years of arrears funding as anticipated by the Bipartisan
Budget Agreement, allowed by the Budget Resolution and as consistent with the
pending authorization bill. The Administration is committed to working with
the Congress to resolve these important issues relating to the future of
international organizations.
The Administration urges the House to strike two provisions that raise
Constitutional concerns: section 609, which concerns diplomatic relations with
Vietnam, and section 610, which relates to command and control of United
Nations peacekeeping efforts. In addition to Constitutional concerns, we
believe that the issues raised by these provisions are being addressed in the
pending authorization bill in more workable and appropriate ways.
Ounce of Prevention Council
The Administration opposes the Committee's termination of the Ounce of
Prevention Council. Elimination of this program would hinder the Federal
Government's ability to help neighborhoods implement balanced strategies to
reduce crime through enforcement, prevention, and intervention. The Council
awards discretionary grants for promising community collaborative crime
prevention programs, publishes a catalog of crime prevention grants and
programs, and provides information and technical assistance. It plays a
critical role in helping communities gain access to information on crime
prevention best practices. The Administration strongly urges the House to
provide funding for the Council and has identified an appropriate offset for
that purpose.
Arms Control and Disarmament Agency
The Administration opposes the Committee mark of $41.5 million for the Arms
Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA), which would undercut the
Administration's efforts to reduce the threat of nuclear and other weapons to
the security of the American people.
Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty
In addition to the $2.8 million requested in the FY 1998 Budget, a $13 million
budget amendment for Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty requirements was
transmitted on July 17th. The Administration urges the House to provide the
full revised request for these important national security activities.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
The Administration strongly urges the House to fully fund the President's
request of $246 million for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
given the importance of its work in addressing unlawful discrimination.
Office of the United States Trade Representative
The Administration appreciates the Committee's increase in funding for, and
its past support of, the Office of the United States Trade Representative
(USTR). USTR has had to manage a seven-fold increase in the number of World
Trade Organization dispute settlement cases since the the signing of the
Uruguay Round Agreement. Despite its substantially increased workload, USTR
has virtually the same number of attorneys working in this area as it did in
1990. USTR's work will be even more important in FY 1998 and in future years
as the United States seeks to capitalize on new market-opening opportunities
and to improve access to existing markets through enforcement actions. USTR
requires full funding in order to accomplish the Administration's trade policy
objectives and to vigorously enforce our rights under trade agreements. In
fact, the Administration is currently reviewing whether the FY 1998 budget
levels need to be increased in order to accomplish this agenda.
Additional Administration concerns with the Committee bill are contained in
the attachment.
Attachment
Attachment
|